Affiliation:
1. 1 Student and Professor and Ellison Chair in International Floriculture, Texas A&M University, Department of Horticultural Sciences, College Station, TX.
Abstract
AbstractThis paper provides a review of the key research efforts that provide evidence of one of the more prominent economic benefits associated with plants and improved landscaped areas – improved property values. These benefits may persuade reluctant residential homeowners to purchase plants and improve their landscapes, may aid municipal leaders and policymakers in justifying green infrastructure-related funding decisions, and may provide grounds for the landscape and general construction industries for using biophilic design principles to ensure the built environment offers opportunities for green space interactions. In this way, the green industry can play a pivotal role not only in providing quality plants for these applications, but in educating stakeholders regarding the economic benefits discussed herein. This research should also be strategically incorporated into both industry-wide and firm-specific marketing messages that highlight the quality-of-life value proposition in order to maintain the industry's sense of value and relevance to residential and municipal landscape consumers of the future. If implemented effectively, the demand for green industry products and services may be affected positively.
Publisher
Horticultural Research Institute
Subject
Horticulture,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Reference43 articles.
1. Behe, B., Hardy J., Barton S., Brooker J., Fernandez T., Hall C., Hicks J., Hinson R., Knight P., McNiel R., Page T., Rowe B., Safley C., and SchutzkiR. 2005. Landscape Plant Material, Size, and Design Sophistication Increase Perceived Home Value. Journal of Environmental Horticulture23: 127– 133. doi: 10.24266/0738-2898-23.3.127.
2. Brander, L.M. and KoetseM.J. 2011. The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. Journal of Environmental Management92: 2763– 2773. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019.
3. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). 2021. Table 2.4.3U. Real Personal Consumption Expenditures by Type of Product, Quantity Indexes. Accessed November 3, 2021.< https://apps.bea.gov/itable/index.cfm>.
4. Cho, S.H., Bowker J.M., and ParkW.M. 2006. Measuring the contribution of water and green space amenities to housing values; An application and comparison of spatially weighted hedonic models. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics31: 485– 507.
5. Conway, D., Li C.Q., Wolch J., Kahle C., and JerrettM. 2010. A Spatial Autocorrelation Approach for Examining the Effects of Urban Greenspace on Residential Property Values. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics41: 150– 169. doi: 10.1007/s11146-008-9159-6.