MEDIA DISCOURSE AND AD HOMINEM COMMUNICATION IN TV DISCUSSIONS

Author:

Borcic Nikolina1,Golubic Lidija2,Holy Mirela3

Affiliation:

1. VERN University

2. Zagreb University of Applied Sciences

3. VERN University,

Abstract

Television talk shows often present a mix of well-reasoned and baseless debates,showcasing diverse communication styles. The way individual attitudes are articulatedcan highlight instances where the speaker employs communication tools ofmanipulations. This study focuses on the presentation of arguments, specifically theconveyance of informative and persuasive functions pertaining to a range of political,economic, social, and personal topics. The objective is to identify instances of adhominem communication, determine the target audience of such communication, andanalyze the communication context and potential repercussions. Ad hominemcommunication arises when the speaker references an individual, using the argument totarget that person directly, thereby implicitly or explicitly undermining their credibility.This form of ad hominem is frequently observed in political discourse and competitivedialogues in general. For this research analytical matrix were employed as research toolsin order to conduct a qualitative content analysis of ad hominem communication inrelation to political, social, economic, and personal topics. The aim of this study is tointroduce a model for analyzing communication styles based on a specific tool designedto shape perceptions of others or oneself. This model's implications are demonstratedthrough an analysis of a random sample from two episodes of the Croatian RadioTelevision's Sunday talk shows, which rank among the most-watched talk shows onCroatian national television. The episodes were chosen using a random numberalgorithm. The findings reveal the instances and manners in which speakers in thesampled episodes employ the ad hominem communication.

Publisher

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE

Reference25 articles.

1. [1] Benoit, P. J., & Benoit, W. L. (2005). Criteria for evaluating political campaign webpages. Southern Communication Journal, 70(3), 230-247.

2. [2] Borcic, N. (2012). Konceptualna metafora i semanticka polja u tekstnoj vrsti politicki intervju u odnosu na rodne osobitosti [Conceptual metaphor and semantic fields in the text type of political interview in relation to gender characteristics] (Doctoral dissertation). Sveuciliste u Zadru, Zadar, Croatia.

3. [3] Borcic, N. (2017). Meduodnos argumentacije, konceptualnih metafora i neverbalne komunikacije u javnim nastupima njemackih i hrvatskih politicara [Interrelation of argumentation, conceptual metaphors, and non-verbal communication in public appearances of German and Croatian politicians] (Doctoral dissertation). Sveuciliste Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku, Osijek, Croatia.

4. [4] Brinton, A. (1985). A rhetorical view of the ad hominem. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 63, 50-63.

5. [5] Brinton, A. (1995). The ad hominem. In H. V. Hansen & R. C. Pinto (Eds.), Fallacies: Classical and contemporary readings (pp. 213-222). Pennsylvania State University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3