Affiliation:
1. University of Groningen, University of the Arts Bremen
Abstract
From medieval anatomic illustrations to today�s physical models, scientific and educational learning objects are facing a long history of getting copied. For example, the commonly used �cell concept�, described as �fried-egg model� [1], is referring to an artificial idea of a composite cell developed in the late 19th century.
This article illustrates contemporary cell models� history of science and design, focusing on the practice of copying. Copying processes may cause issues within an artefacts� didactic and scientific significance. Referring to recent research, the ongoing copying, propagation and use of the �common idea of the cell� within science education limits students� perception of the diversity and variability of cells in structure and function [2]. Furthermore, common learning challenges are associated with students� level of awareness of these generalized cell models� limitations. Against this backdrop, the article is exploring the question of how designers and artists can break often copied but seldomly questioned model traditions between artistic practice and research. Experimental, design-based findings will complete the presented discourse.
Publisher
SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society
Reference20 articles.
1. [1] Clement, Pierre: Le concept de cellule: de la recherche a l�enseignement�. Actes du troisieme seminaire francophone de didactique de la biologie, Louvain-la-Neuve, pp 129-154, 1988.
2. [2] Knox, Milissa: Thinking Beyond the Fried Egg Model: How Accurately Do Students Perceive Cells in a Living Context? Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2355 [http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2355], 2015.
3. [3] Steadman, Philip: Abstraction and Schematization in the Repeated Copying of Designs. Social Analysis, Vol. 63, Issue 4, pp 131-148, 2019.
4. [4] Kohn, Oliver & Roussel, Martin: Kopieren. In: Christians, Heiko et. al. (Eds.) Historisches Worterbuch des Mediengebrauchs, Bohlau Verlag, Koln, Weimar, Wien, pp 369-381, 2015.
5. [5] Bahr, Amrei: Was hei?t �ein Artefakt illegitim kopieren�? Grundlagen einer artefaktbezogener Ethik des Kopierens. DZPhil, Akademie Verlag, 61, 2, pp 283-299, 2013.