Affiliation:
1. University of Ljubljana
Abstract
The so-called ‘denazification’ of Ukraine and the need to free the country from the radical nationalists was used by the Russian government as a central argument to justify the military invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. However, the discussion of radical right-wing nationalist groups allegedly active in Ukraine and violently oppressing the Russian-speaking population have been maintained by the governing regime in Russia already since the so-called Euromaidan protests in 2013-2014. The word ‘banderivtsi’, disciples or sons and daughters of Stepan Bandera, the leader of the Ukrainian nationalist organisations OUN and UPA, became widely used, first, by Russian pro-governmental media who this way referred to what they presented as the nationalist population of Ukraine. Consequently, the Ukrainians started using the term themselves, in an ironic way, to re-appropriate it and re-establish the national identity reshaped by the years of informational and actual wars. The present piece discusses the centrality of the concept of Ukrainian nationalism in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. It examines how, seeking further separation from Russia, the Ukrainian government has been changing its memory politics towards a significantly modified perception and interpretation of the shared past. It argues that building parallels between attacking ‘nationalist Ukraine’ and the victory over Nazi Germany central to the glorious past of Russia within the state memory politics was used by Kremlin to justify the military action in the neighbouring country.
Publisher
Metropolitan University Prague
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Safety Research
Reference30 articles.
1. Alkatiri, Z. & De Archellie, R. (2021): National Patriotic Day Parade: The Politics of Historical Memory and Reconstruction of the Russian Identity During Putin Era. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1992081.
2. Balibar, É. (2015): Citizenship. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3. Chernetsky, V. (2003): Postcolonialism, Russia and Ukraine. Ulbandus Review, 7, 32–62.
4. Doran, C. (2019): Postcolonialism, Anti-colonialism, Nationalism and History. International Studies, 56(2–3), 92–108.
5. Gerasimov, I. & Mogilner, M. (2015): Deconstructing Integration: Ukraine’s Postcolonial Subjectivity. Slavic Review, 74(4), 715–722.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献