Affiliation:
1. University of Tartu, Estonia
2. University of Jyväskylä, Finland
Abstract
This article seeks to analyse the process of conflictual rebordering in the EU’s relations with Russia. The authors single out three major crises that triggered and shaped the process of toughening the border regime and the related transformations of political meaning of the EU-Russia border: the COVID-19 pandemic, the drastic deterioration of Moscow-Brussels relations in the beginning of 2021 and the war in Ukraine that started on 24 February 2022. Correspondingly, the EU’s reactions to each of these critical junctures might be described through the academic concepts of governmentality, normativity and geopolitics. Our aim is to look at the three ensuing models – governmental, normative and geopolitical rebordering – from the vantage point of Estonia and Finland, two EU member states sharing borders with Russia, yet in the meantime remaining distinct from each other in developing particular border policies and approaches vis-a-vis their eastern neighbour.
Publisher
Metropolitan University Prague
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Safety Research
Reference95 articles.
1. Aaslaid, A. (2021): Estonia is Organizing a Significant Meeting on Transboundary Watercourses. Ministry of Environment of Republic of Estonia, 29 September, .
2. Ahrens, B. (2018): Normative power Europe in crisis? Understanding the productive role of Ambiguity for the EU’s Transformative Agenda. Asia Europe Journal, 6, 199–212.
3. Amoore, L. (2006): Biometric Borders: Governing Mobilities in the War on Terror. Political Geography, 25, 36-351.
4. Baar van, H. (2017): Evictability and the Biopolitical Bordering of Europe. Antipode, 49 (1), 212–230.
5. Barsyonova, N. (2021): Kadri Liik: strany Baltii v Otnoshenii Rossii Mogli by Deistvovat Vmeste s ES i NATO [Kadri Liik: The Baltic States Could Act Together with the EU and NATO on Russia]. ERR, 24 April, .