Author:
Glajzer Jacek,Castillo-Tong Dan Cacsire,Richter Rolf,Vergote Ignace,Kulbe Hagen,Vanderstichele Adriaan,Ruscito Ilary,Trillsch Fabian,Mustea Alexander,Kreuzinger Caroline,Gourley Charlie,Gabra Hani,Taube Eliane T.,Dorigo Oliver,Horst David,Keunecke Carlotta,Baum Joanna,Angelotti Timothy,Sehouli Jalid,Braicu Elena Ioana
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study seeks to evaluate the impact of breast cancer (BRCA) gene status on tumor dissemination pattern, surgical outcome and survival in a multicenter cohort of paired primary ovarian cancer (pOC) and recurrent ovarian cancer (rOC).
Patients and Methods
Medical records and follow-up data from 190 patients were gathered retrospectively. All patients had surgery at pOC and at least one further rOC surgery at four European high-volume centers. Patients were divided into one cohort with confirmed mutation for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCAmut) and a second cohort with BRCA wild type or unknown (BRCAwt). Patterns of tumor presentation, surgical outcome and survival data were analyzed between the two groups.
Results
Patients with BRCAmut disease were on average 4 years younger and had significantly more tumor involvement upon diagnosis. Patients with BRCAmut disease showed higher debulking rates at all stages. Multivariate analysis showed that only patient age had significant predictive value for complete tumor resection in pOC. At rOC, however, only BRCAmut status significantly correlated with optimal debulking. Patients with BRCAmut disease showed significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) by 24.3 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) was prolonged in the BRCAmut group at all stages as well, reaching statistical significance during recurrence.
Conclusions
Patients with BRCAmut disease showed a more aggressive course of disease with earlier onset and more extensive tumor dissemination at pOC. However, surgical outcome and OS were significantly better in patients with BRCAmut disease compared with patients with BRCAwt disease. We therefore propose to consider BRCAmut status in regard to patient selection for cytoreductive surgery, especially in rOC.
Funder
European Commission
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Sehouli J, Grabowski JP. Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: options and limits. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;41:88–95.
2. Capozzi VA, Rosati A, Turco LC, Sozzi G, Riccò M, Chiofalo B, et al. Surgery vs chemotherapy for ovarian cancer recurrence: what is the best treatment option. Gland Surg. 2020;9(4):1112–7.
3. Harter P, Sehouli J, Vergote I, Ferron G, Reuss A, Meier W, Greggi S, Mosgaard BJ, Selle F, Guyon F, Pomel C, Lécuru F, Zang R, Avall-Lundqvist E, Kim JW, Ponce J, Raspagliesi F, Kristensen G, Classe JM, Hillemanns P, Jensen P, Hasenburg A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Mirza MR, Lund B, Reinthaller A, Santaballa A, Olaitan A, Hilpert F, du Bois A; DESKTOP III Investigators. Randomized trial of cytoreductive surgery for relapsed ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2 Dec 2021;385(23):2123–2131. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2103294. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 17 Feb 2022;386(7):704.
4. Muallem MZ, Gasimli K, Richter R, Almuheimid J, Nasser S, Braicu EI, et al. AGO score as a predictor of surgical outcome at secondary cytoreduction in patients with ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(6):3423–9.
5. Harter P, du Bois A, Hahmann M, Hasenburg A, Burges A, Loibl S, et al. Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(12):1702–10.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献