Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study

Published:2023-09-12 Issue:13 Volume:30 Page:8271-8277
ISSN:1068-9265
Container-title:Annals of Surgical Oncology
language:en
Short-container-title:Ann Surg Oncol

Author:

Hong Ziqiang,Cui Baiqiang,Wang Kai,Bai Xiangdou,Yang Ning,Zhang Yu,Wu Xusheng,Cheng Tao,Jin Dacheng,Zhao Jing,Gou Yunjiu

Funder

Gansu Province Key R&D Project

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Oncology,Surgery

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-023-14208-6.pdf

Reference16 articles.

1. Zhu H, Wang Z, Deng B, et al. Epidemiological landscape of esophageal cancer in Asia: results from GLOBOCAN 2020. Thorac Cancer. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14835.

2. Guo W, Ma X, Yang S, et al. Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(9):3873–81.

3. Hong Z, Gou W, Lu Y, et al. Efficacy of modified thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis versus traditional thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis for esophageal cancer: Propensity score-matched analysis. Front Oncol. 2023;12:1076014.

4. van Hillegersberg R, Boone J, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, Giezeman MJ, Borel Rinkes IH. First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(9):1435–9.

5. Banks KC, Hsu DS, Velotta JB. Outcomes of minimally invasive and robot-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(15):3667.