Author:
Palis Bryan E.,Nelson Heidi
Funder
Fogarty International Center
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference5 articles.
1. Bray F, Parkin DM. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):747–55.
2. Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):756–64.
3. Palis BE, Janczewski LM, Browner AE, et al. National Cancer Database conforms with standardized framework for registry and data quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15393-8.
4. Knutson AC, McNamara EJ, McKellar DP, Kaufman CS, Winchester DP. The role of the American College of Surgeons’ cancer program accreditation in influencing oncologic outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(5):611–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23680. (Epub 2014 Jul 8 PMID: 25042831).
5. American College of Surgeons. Commission on Cancer Optimal Resources for Cancer Care. January 2020. Available at: https://www.facs.or/quality-programs/cancer/coc/standards/2020. Accessed 22 April 2024.