Determining Hospital Volume Threshold for Safety of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Contemporary Cutpoint Analysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Determining Hospital Volume Threshold for Safety of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Contemporary Cutpoint Analysis

Published:2021-11-01 Issue:3 Volume:29 Page:1566-1574
ISSN:1068-9265
Container-title:Annals of Surgical Oncology
language:en
Short-container-title:Ann Surg Oncol

Author:

Conroy Patricia C.,Calthorpe Lucia,Lin Joseph A.,Mohamedaly Sarah,Kim Alex,Hirose Kenzo,Nakakura Eric,Corvera Carlos,Sosa Julie Ann,Sarin Ankit,Kirkwood Kimberly S.,Alseidi Adnan,Adam Mohamed A.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Oncology,Surgery

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-021-10984-1.pdf

Reference29 articles.

1. Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Noguchi K, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(6):958–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1195-x.

2. Vanounou T, Steel JL, Nguyen KT, et al. Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(4):998–1009. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0839-0.

3. Anderson KL, Adam MA, Thomas S, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Impact of minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy on use of adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2017;213(4):601–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.005.

4. Varley PR, Zenati MS, Klobuka A, et al. Does robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy improve outcomes in patients with high risk morphometric features compared to the open approach. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(6):695–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2018.10.016.

5. Baimas-George M, Watson M, Murphy KJ, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy may offer improved oncologic outcomes over open surgery: a propensity-matched single-institution study. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(8):3644–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07564-x.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Initiation of a robotic pancreatoduodenectomy program using virtual collaboration;HPB;2024-09

2. Comparing oncologic and surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a propensity-matched analysis;Surgical Endoscopy;2024-03-18

3. Racial and Socioeconomic Differences and Surgical Outcomes in Pancreaticoduodenectomy Patients: A Systematic Review of High- Versus Low-Volume Hospitals in the United States;The American Surgeon™;2023-11-08

4. A Short-Term Outcomes Comparison of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy at Different Stages of Learning Curves: A Single Center Report;Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;2023-10-01

5. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a narrative review of the feasibility and outcomes;Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery;2023-04