Class Evaluation Using IoT Skin Conductance Measuring Instruments-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Class Evaluation Using IoT Skin Conductance Measuring Instruments

Published:2019-03-30 Issue:1 Volume:37 Page:17-27
ISSN:0289-2405
Container-title:Japanese Journal of Physiological Psychology and Psychophysiology
language:en
Short-container-title:jjppp

Author:

NAGANO Yuichiro¹,NAGATA Yuto²,MIYANISHI Yukako³,NAGAHAMA Toru⁴,MORITA Yusuke⁵

Affiliation:

1. Department of Human Studies, Bunkyo Gakuin University

2. Graduate School of Human Studies, Bunkyo Gakuin University

3. Graduate School of Human Sciences, Waseda University

4. Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning, Tokyo Institute of Technology

5. Faculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University

Publisher

Japanese Society for Physiological Psychology and Psychophysiology

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjppp/37/1/37_1903si/_pdf

Reference7 articles.

1. Barry. R. J. (1982). Novelty and significance effects in the fractionation of phasic OR measures: A synthesis with traditional OR theory. Psychophysiology, 19, 28–35.

2. Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2007). The electrodermal system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 159–181). New York: Cambridge University Press.

3. Dindo. L., & Fowles, D. C. (2008). The skin conductance orienting response to semantic stimuli: Significance can be independent of arousal. Psychophysiology, 45, 111–118.

4. Doberenz, S., Roth, W. T., Wollburg, E., Breuninger, C., & Kim, S. (2010). Twenty-four hour skin conductance in panic disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 44, 1137–1147.

5. Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning style. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21, 103–112.