Assisted bathing of older adults with dementia: a mixed methods systematic review update

Author:

Konno Rie1,Suzuki Miyuki1,Hosomi Akiyo1,Lizarondo Lucylynn2,Stern Cindy2

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan

2. JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Abstract

Objective: This review update aimed to determine the best strategies for assisted bathing or showering for older adults with dementia. Introduction: Assisted bathing is a high-risk activity, as it can trigger agitated behaviors. Assisted bathing of older adults with dementia can create caregiver challenges and stress. Inclusion criteria: This review update considered quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies that investigated, firstly, older adults with dementia who required assistance in bathing and, secondly, their caregivers and family members who provided this assistance. The quantitative component considered randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies testing interventions for reducing agitated behaviors in older adults with dementia during bathing, as well as perceived confidence or satisfaction in caregivers. The qualitative component considered studies that reported on experiences of clients or caregivers during the bathing process. Methods: A JBI mixed methods review was conducted following the convergent segregated approach. The review considered studies published between 1990 and March 11, 2022. The databases searched were PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase. Gray literature was also searched. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts. Full texts were retrieved for studies that met the inclusion criteria and were assessed further for eligibility. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of included studies and extracted data using the standardized JBI tools. Due to methodological and clinical heterogeneity, the results were presented in narratively in the quantitative section. For the qualitative component, meta-synthesis was conducted following the JBI approach of meta-aggregation. Finally, evidence from the 2 components was integrated following the convergent segregated approach. Results: Ten quantitative and 4 qualitative studies were included. The methodological quality was poor to moderate in the quantitative studies and moderate to high in the qualitative studies. Results from 3 quantitative studies suggested that providing training to caregivers on person-centered bathing reduced agitated behaviors in older adults with dementia. Other interventions did not show conclusive evidence of their effectiveness in any outcomes of interest. Two synthesized findings highlighted i) the importance of working within each person’s reality by having the skills and knowledge required to deliver person-centered assistance and ii) the challenges experienced by caregivers, such as lack of support, time pressure, and safety-related fears. The integrated evidence showed that the quantitative and qualitative components complemented each other to promote the training of caregivers to deliver person-centered bathing. Discussion: Integrated findings can help inform an evidence-based strategy utilizing a person-centered bathing approach to reduce agitated behaviors in older adults with dementia. Due to the limited number of eligible studies, and the clinical and methodological heterogeneity of included quantitative studies, no statistical pooling was possible. More studies are needed, particularly intervention studies with high methodological quality. Conclusions: This review update suggests that providing caregivers with person-centered bathing training should be encouraged prior to bathing older adults with dementia. Caregivers should have knowledge and skills, such as relevant assessment and communication skills, enabling them to provide effective bathing experiences to older adults living with dementia. Organizations should provide caregivers with appropriate resources and training for bathing older adults with dementia. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020208048 Supplemental Digital Content: A Japanese-language version of the abstract of this review is available as Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/SRX/A37.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3