Barriers and facilitators of vision screening in the US pediatric primary care setting: a mixed methods systematic review protocol

Author:

Killeen Olivia J.12ORCID,Saylor Kate M.3,Hogan Caroline14,Jacobson Adam2,Collins Megan5,Ehrlich Joshua R.126

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

3. Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

5. Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

6. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to understand the barriers and facilitators of vision screening in the US primary care setting for children aged 3 to 17 years. Introduction: Childhood vision screening is crucial because it detects children at risk of undiagnosed vision problems. Previous studies report low rates of appropriate vision screening in the primary care setting. We aim to identify barriers and facilitators of pediatric primary care vision screening to inform future interventions to improve childhood vision screening. Inclusion criteria: Studies of all types that identify barriers and facilitators of vision screening in children aged 3 to 17 years in the pediatric primary care setting in the US will be considered for inclusion. Methods: We will search PubMed, CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), Scopus, Web of Science (SCI-EXPANDED, ESCI, CPCI-S, SSCI), Cochrane Library, and Embase. We will also search gray literature, including conference proceedings, professional organization reports, and clinical trials. We will use supplemental search strategies, including citation tracking and contacting authors for unpublished data. Titles and abstracts will be screened independently by 2 reviewers and selected for full-text screening based on prespecified inclusion criteria. Only studies in English will be considered. Each included study will be appraised using the mixed methods appraisal tool. Data will be extracted using a modified JBI mixed methods data extraction form. Qualitative and quantitative data will be integrated using a convergent integrated approach. Details of the review available at: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/nhf5d/

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3