Organ donation following medical assistance in dying series: a scoping review – Part 2 – existing processes and procedures

Author:

Silva e Silva Vanessa1,Silva Amina Regina2,Rochon Andrea3,Lotherington Ken4,Hornby Laura4,Wind Tineke5,Bollen Jan6,Wilson Lindsay C.4,Sarti Aimee J.7,Dhanani Sonny8

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada

2. Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada

3. School of Nursing, St. Lawrence College, Kingston, ON, Canada

4. Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada

5. Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

6. Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboudumc Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

7. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Critical Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

8. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to collate and summarize the current literature on what is known about organ donation following. For this part II of a 2-part series scoping review, the focus is on the existing procedures and processes for organ donation following MAiD. Introduction: Organ donation following MAiD is a novel and contentious issue worldwide. To give direction for future research and initiatives, a comprehensive understanding of the available evidence of existing procedures and processes for organ donation following MAiD is needed. Inclusion criteria: For this review, our population of interest included all individuals who underwent organ donation following MAiD; our concept was defined as procedures and processes involved in organ donation after MAiD; and the context was reports of organ donation following MAiD at home or in any health care setting worldwide. We considered quantitative and qualitative studies, text and opinion papers, gray literature, and unpublished material provided by stakeholders. Methods: This scoping review was conducted in line with JBI methodology. Published studies were retrieved from MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), Web of Science – Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index, and Academic Search Complete (EBSCOhost). Gray and unpublished literature included reports from websites and organ donation organizations in Canada, Belgium, and The Netherlands. Two independent reviewers screened all reports (both title and abstract, and full text) against the predetermined inclusion criteria, extracted data, and completed a content analysis. Any disagreements between the 2 reviewers were resolved through discussion or with another author. Results: We included 121 documents across the two-part series, and we are reporting on 103 in this part II. The majority of the 103 documents were discussion papers, published in English and in Canada from 2019 to 2021. In the content analysis, we identified 5 major categories regarding existing procedures and processes of organ donation following MAiD: i) clinical pathways for organ donation following MAiD; ii) organ donation following MAiD and the donor; iii) clinical practice tools for organ donation following MAiD; iv) education and support for health care providers involved in organ donation following MAiD; and v) health care providers’ roles and perceptions during organ donation following MAiD. Conclusions: Findings from this review can be used to provide support and guidance for improvements in procedures and processes, as well as a rich resource for countries currently planning to establish programs for organ donation after MAiD.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference88 articles.

1. Organ donation after medical assistance in dying—Canada’s first cases. New Eng;Ball;J Med,2020

2. Voluntary euthanasia-implications for organ donation;Ball;New Eng J Med,2018

3. Organ donation following euthanasia starting at home;Mulder;Transplant Int,2017

4. Organ donation after physician-assisted death;Detry;Transplant Int,2008

5. Dividing line between organ donation and euthanasia in a combined procedure;Bollen;J Med Ethics,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3