Bayesian approach for meta-analyses in biomedical research: a scoping review protocol

Author:

Santos Joseph Alvin1,Riggi Emilia2,Grant Robert34,Ingale Samiksha5,Bhaumik Soumyadeep56,Di Tanna Gian Luca16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care (DEASS), University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Ticino, Switzerland

2. Epidemiology and Screening Unit – CPO, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy

3. BayesCamp Ltd, Winchester, UK

4. Kingston University, London, UK

5. Meta-research and Evidence Synthesis Unit, The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India

6. Meta-research and Evidence Synthesis Unit, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Objective: The overarching aim of this scoping review is to describe and analyze the scope of use and reporting of Bayesian methods in meta-analyses in biomedical research. Introduction: The Bayesian approach provides a powerful and flexible framework for meta-analysis, particularly suited for dealing with complex, sparse, or heterogeneous data. Due to these advantages and its appeal, Bayesian methods have been increasingly used in many areas of biomedical research; however, their use in meta-analysis remains scarce. Inclusion criteria: This review will include studies that used Bayesian methods for meta-analysis of primary studies in biomedical research. Methods: The proposed review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews will be searched to identify relevant full-text papers published since 2016 in the English language. No geographical restriction will be applied. Two reviewers will screen the articles and extract the data using a tool that will be pilot-tested and revised, as necessary. Analysis will involve frequency counts, narrative synthesis, and mapping concepts to propose an appropriate workflow. The details of the scoping review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Review Registration: Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/jenp4/

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference10 articles.

1. Meta-analysis in medical research;Haidich;Hippokratia,2010

2. Systematic reviews of trials and other studies;Sutton;Health Technol Assess,1998

3. Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review;Spiegelhalter;Health Technol Assess,2000

4. Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis;Sutton;Stat Methods Med Res,2001

5. The uptake of Bayesian methods in biomedical meta-analyses: a scoping review (2005-2016);Grant;J Evid Based Med,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3