Health literacy and parenting infants at home: protocol for a qualitative systematic review of parents’ experiences

Author:

Sakai Ayano1ORCID,Ishimaru Mina12ORCID,Iwata Hiroko23ORCID,Iwase Seiko1ORCID,Suzuki Satoko4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

2. The Chiba University Centre for Evidence-Based Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence Chiba, Japan

3. Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

4. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review will identify and synthesize the available qualitative evidence regarding parents’ experiences of health literacy in parenting infants at home. Introduction: Parental health literacy, which is essential for parents’ and children’s health, is associated with parents’ health knowledge, parenting practices, and children’s health outcomes. Parents face difficulties pertaining to their health literacy skills in daily health education and health care for their infants; therefore, understanding their parenting experience with infants from a health literacy perspective is important for health professionals. This review will evaluate and integrate qualitative evidence regarding parental experiences of health literacy in daily parenting of infants at home. Inclusion criteria: This review will include qualitative data from empirical studies describing parents’ experiences of health literacy in parenting infants at home. Parents of infants (0–1 year of age) living at home in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries will be included. Methods: This review will follow the JBI approach for qualitative systematic reviews. The following databases will be searched for published and unpublished studies: MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and ProQuest Health and Medical Collection (in English and Japanese); Open Access Theses and Dissertations (in English); and Ichushi-Web, CiNii, and the Institutional Repositories Database (in Japanese). Study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal of the methodological quality of studies will be undertaken by 2 reviewers independently. Data synthesis will be conducted using the meta-aggregation approach, and the synthesized findings will be assessed using the ConQual approach. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022345187

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3