Experiences of accessing mental health services for women living on a low income in Canada: a qualitative systematic review protocol

Author:

Vanderlee Emma1ORCID,Abate Addisu Taye1ORCID,Godfrey Christina12ORCID,Duhn Lenora12ORCID,Camargo-Plazas Pilar12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

2. Queen’s Collaboration for Health Care Quality: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Kingston, ON, Canada

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to comprehensively analyze qualitative evidence on the experiences of Canadian women aged 18 years or above living on a low income. The review will examine the intersectionality of their identities and privileges when accessing mental health services, with the aim of informing targeted interventions and policy improvements. Introduction: Despite the growing body of research on mental health disparities and a call for improved mental health care, both globally and in Canada, there is a need to identify recommendations for system enhancement and to improve gender equality by understanding the nuanced experiences of accessing mental health care for Canadian women living on a low income. Inclusion criteria: This review will include qualitative studies conducted within the past decade about women of diverse backgrounds aged 18 years or above who identify as living on a low income and who have resided in Canada for 6 months or longer. Studies using any qualitative methodology will be included. Methods: The following databases will be searched for published studies: MEDLINE and PsycINFO (Ovid); CINAHL and Pre-CINAHL (EBSCOhost); LiSSa; and Google Scholar. Searches for unpublished studies will include the Primo Central Index, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and the Canadian Women’s Foundation Studies. The review will include studies published in English and French in Canada, from 2013 to the present. The JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence will be followed, informing study selection, appraisal, extraction, synthesis, and assessment of confidence, which will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023430100.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3