Effectiveness of dose-intensified salvage regimens versus standard-dose chemotherapy for progression-free survival in early progressed follicular lymphoma before autologous stem cell transplantation: a systematic review protocol

Author:

Pereira Mesquita Felipe1ORCID,Borges dos Santos Kelli2,Takahashi Juliana Akie3ORCID,Guimarães Dutra Giffoni dos Santos Marina1,Felizardo Alvim Glauber1,Hallack Neto Abrahão Elias1

Affiliation:

1. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil

2. Faculdade de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil

3. Brazilian Centre for Evidence-based Healthcare: A JBI Centre of Excellence, São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

Objective: This review will evaluate the effectiveness of dose-intensified versus standard-dose salvage regimens on progression-free survival in early progressed follicular lymphoma before high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Introduction: Despite the substantial advances in the management of follicular lymphoma, approximately 20% of patients experience progression of the disease within 2 years of induction therapy. These patients have worse outcomes, and autologous stem cell transplantation has been shown to improve outcomes in this context. Little is known about the optimal salvage regimen. Inclusion criteria: Studies must include patients ≥18 years old with early progressed follicular lymphoma who were submitted to autologous stem cell transplantation in subsequent remission. Clinical trials and observational studies will be included. Methods: The search strategy will be carried out in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Periódicos CAPES), Scopus, Web of Science, LiLACS, and the Cochrane Library. No date or language restrictions will be imposed. The recommended JBI approach to critical appraisal, study selection, data extraction, and data synthesis will be used. Studies should score at least 50% in accordance with the critical appraisal tool. Data will be pooled whenever possible using the random effects model. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the standard χ2 and I 2 tests. A funnel plot will be generated to assess publication bias if there are 10 or more studies included in the meta-analysis. The GRADE approach will be used to rate certainty of evidence. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022373345

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3