Counselor bias and contraceptive counseling for women: a scoping review protocol

Author:

McMurtery Reagan E.12,Palokas Michelle12

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA

2. Mississippi Centre for Evidence Based Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to identify factors, tools, and interventions related to counselor biases and contraceptive counseling in women. Introduction: Contraceptive counseling is the transfer of knowledge regarding contraceptive methods to aid an individual in selecting, discontinuing, or changing contraception. The counselor should deliver information based on the patient’s needs and preferences. The type and quality of the contraceptive information women are provided with should not vary based on social or physical factors, such as age, race, religion, sexual orientation, education level, sexual preference, or weight; however, professional bias continues to be a concern in health care. The results of this review may further the understanding of counselor bias and contraceptive counseling. Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will consider studies that include health care professionals providing contraceptive counseling to female patients in any setting or geographic location. Studies reporting on factors, tools, and interventions related to counselor bias and contraceptive counseling will be included. Methods: Databases to be searched are MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, JBI Evidence-based Practice Database, Europe PubMed Central, and Cochrane Library. Sources of gray literature will include ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, PaperFirst, and MedNar. The review will include studies published in English from 1994 and follow the JBI guidelines for scoping reviews. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts, then full texts. Data from relevant studies will be extracted using a tool created by the reviewers. The results will be presented as a narrative summary and in diagrammatic or tabular format. Review registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/judp5

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3