Exploring approaches to contemporary clinical incident analysis methods within acute care settings: a scoping review protocol

Author:

Kynoch Kathryn123,Liu Xianliang456,Tan Jing-Yu (Benjamin)457,Shi Wendan8910,Teus Judeil Krlan8910,Ramis Mary-Anne12

Affiliation:

1. Mater Health, Brisbane, Qld, Australia

2. Queensland Centre for Evidence-Based Nursing and Midwifery: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Brisbane, Qld, Australia

3. School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Qld

4. School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Qld, Australia

5. Charles Darwin Centre for Evidence-Based Practice: A JBI Affiliated Group, Darwin, NT, Australia

6. School of Nursing and Health Studies, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China

7. School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, QLD, Australia

8. Centre for Evidence-Based Initiatives in Health Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Sydney, NSW Australia

9. St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

10. School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Objective: This review will explore the literature on contemporary incident analysis methods used in acute hospital settings, identifying types and characteristics of these methods and how they are used to minimize, prevent, or learn from errors and improve patient safety. Introduction: Safety is a major focus in health care; however, despite best efforts, errors and incidents still occur, leading to harm or potential harm to patients, families, carers, staff, or the organization. Incident analysis methods aim to reduce risk of harm. Traditional methods have been criticized for failing to consider the complexity of health care and the dynamic nature of acute care settings. Alternative methodologies are being sought to achieve higher levels of patient safety and care quality care in hospitals. Learning from errors and communicating with those involved in incidents are key requirements in contemporary incident analysis. Inclusion criteria: This review will consider empirical research published since 2013, reporting on the use of clinical incident analysis methods within acute care settings. The review will explore ways in which consumers or stakeholders (eg, clinicians or other hospital workers, patients, families, carers, visitors) have been included in these analysis methods and how data have been used to support changes in the service or organization. Methods: Following JBI methods and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidance, we will search PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ProQuest Theses and Dissertations. Studies will be reviewed independently, with results presented in tables, figures, and narrative summaries according to the concepts of interest.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference24 articles.

1. The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events: a scoping review;Schwendimann;BMC Health Serv Res,2018

2. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review;De Vries;BMJ Qual Saf,2008

3. Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis;Panagioti;BMJ,2019

4. How effective are incident-reporting systems for improving patient safety? A systematic literature review;Stavropoulou;Milbank Q,2015

5. The problem with incident reporting;Macrae;BMJ Qual Saf,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3