Experiences and attitude of task shifting and task sharing of physicians, nurses, and nursing assistants in hospitals: a qualitative systematic review protocol

Author:

Saiki Masatoshi1,Nishimiya Gaku2,Gotoh Tomomi3,Hirota Kazuhito3,Sakai Ikuko14

Affiliation:

1. Department of Advanced Clinical Nursing, Frontier Clinical Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba university, Chiba, Japan

2. Nursing Department, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan

3. Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

4. The Chiba University Centre for Evidence Based Practice: A JBI Centre for Excellence, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to explore the experiences and attitudes of physicians, nurses, and nursing assistants regarding task-shifting and task-sharing in hospitals. Introduction: Despite multiple health care professionals performing overlapping tasks, the need for effective task-shifting and task-sharing remains a concern. Understanding task-shifting and task-sharing experiences, as well as the attitudes of health care providers in hospitals, is essential for providing safe and patient-appropriate care with limited human resources. Inclusion criteria: Qualitative studies that examine the experiences and attitudes of physicians, nurses, and nursing assistants in hospitals regarding task-shifting and task-sharing will be included. The review will include physicians, advanced practice nurses who are nurse practitioners or clinical nurse specialists, registered nurses, and nursing assistants. Midwives, pharmacists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, and students will be excluded. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science will be searched as part of a 3-step search strategy. We will search for unpublished research and gray literature using Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Inclusion criteria will be studies published in English or Japanese from the time each database was established to the present. The methodological quality of all studies will be evaluated by screening against the inclusion criteria and by at least 2 critical evaluations using the standardized JBI checklist. Synthesized results will be pooled by meta-aggregation and published as a ConQual Summary of Findings. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023409612

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Nursing

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3