An exploration of the definitions and measures that have been used when investigating fatigue in adults with Long COVID: a scoping review protocol

Author:

Thomas Bethan1,Pattinson Rachael1,Edwards Deborah2,Dale Carys1,Jenkins Benjamin1,Lande Helena3,Bundy Christine1,Davies Jennifer L.1

Affiliation:

1. School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Great Britain

2. Wales Centre For Evidence Based Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Great Britain

3. School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Great Britain

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this scoping review is to investigate how fatigue is defined and measured in adults with long COVID. Introduction: Following COVID-19 infection, 10% to 20% of individuals go on to experience persisting symptoms for a minimum of 3 months; this is commonly known as long COVID. Fatigue is one of the most prevalent symptoms of long COVID, but there is currently no consistently applied definition of long COVID fatigue. To advance our understanding of long COVID fatigue, we must first identify the current definitions and measures being used to describe and quantify this condition. Inclusion criteria: This review will consider published and unpublished studies from January 2020 onwards involving adults (≥18 years) that define and/or measure long COVID fatigue. There will be no initial language restrictions, and papers using both quantitative and qualitative designs will be included. Conference abstracts, editorials, and opinion papers will be excluded. Methods: Published studies will be searched for across MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Ovid), Scopus, PsycINFO (Ovid), Web of Science, Epistemonikos, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Dimensions, Overton, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses will be searched for unpublished literature. Eligible records will be de-duplicated, and 2 independent reviewers will carry out title, abstract, and full-text screening. A data extraction tool will be pilot tested on a small number of papers, then modified as necessary (any modifications will be detailed in the scoping review). Findings will be presented in tables and charts, supported by a narrative summary. Review Registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/hnf8z

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3