Protocols for breaking bad news in health care: a scoping review protocol

Author:

Cardoso Ana Filipa123ORCID,Rosendo Inês456ORCID,Santiago Luiz7ORCID,Neto Joana8ORCID,Cardoso Daniela123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal

2. Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal

3. Portugal Centre for Evidence Based Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal

4. USF Coimbra Centro, Coimbra, Portugal

5. Faculty of Medicine of University of Coimbra, University of Coimbra Coimbra, Portugal

6. Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal

7. Centre for Health Studies and Research of the University of Coimbra (CEISUC), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

8. Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review will map the available evidence on communication protocols for breaking bad news to adult patients and their families in health care. Introduction: Breaking bad news to adult patients and their families is a challenging task for health care professionals. To address these challenges, communication protocols have been developed to support health care professionals in breaking bad news in a compassionate and effective manner while respecting each patient’s individuality. Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will consider all studies that focus on communication protocols (original or adapted versions) to break bad news to adult patients and/or their families (adults) in any health care context, regardless of the approach (face-to-face, telephone, video, or other). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies, systematic reviews, and text and opinion papers will be considered for inclusion in this review. Methods: This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy will aim to locate both published and unpublished evidence in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. The databases to be searched include CINAHL Plus Complete (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (PubMed), Academic Search Complete, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Gray literature will also be searched for. Two independent reviewers will independently perform study selection and data extraction. Data will be extracted using a data extraction tool developed by the reviewers. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion or with an additional reviewer. Data will be presented in tabular and narrative format. Details of the review can be found in Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/s6ru7/

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3