Effectiveness of physical stimulation for reducing injection pain in adults receiving intramuscular injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

CMC Serena123,Lord Heidi4,Vargese Saritha Susan25,Kurian Nisha25,Cherian Sunu Alice236,Mathew Elsheba235,Fernandez Ritin478

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Pushpagiri College of Nursing, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India

2. Pushpagiri Centre for Evidence-based Practice (PCEBP): A JBI Affiliated Group, Thiruvilla, Kerala, India

3. Pushpagiri Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India

4. Centre for Research in Nursing and Health, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

5. Department of Community Medicine, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India

6. Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Pushpagiri College of Dental Sciences, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India

7. University of Newcastle, Gosford, NSW, Australia

8. Centre for Evidence Based Initiatives in Health Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review was to synthesize the best available research evidence regarding the effectiveness of physical stimulation for reducing injection pain in adults receiving intramuscular injections. Introduction: Pain associated with intramuscular injections continues to be a challenge for nurses. Various physical stimulation methods to alleviate pain and improve satisfaction for patients receiving intramuscular injections have been reported; however, the evidence surrounding the effectiveness of these methods remains inconclusive. Inclusion criteria: This systematic review considered randomized and quasi-experimental studies that used any physical stimulation strategies (eg, skin tapping, manual pressure, massage, pinch, traction) for adults aged 18 years and over receiving intramuscular injections. Studies that evaluated pain using validated instruments were considered for inclusion. Methods: A three-step search strategy was conducted. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library (Cochrane CENTRAL), Google Scholar, Dissertation Abstracts International, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and MedNar were searched from inception until 2020. We restricted the inclusion of studies to trials published in English. Two independent reviewers conducted the critical appraisal of eligible studies using the JBI checklists for randomized controlled and quasi-experimental trials. Data were extracted using the JBI data extraction tool, and meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were undertaken, where appropriate. Results: Twenty-five studies were included with a total sample size of 1956 patients. Pooled results demonstrated that pain was significantly less with the use of the Helfer skin tap technique compared to no intervention (two studies; RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.66, 0.81; P<0.00001) or standard intervention (three studies; SMD –2.25; 95% CI –3.65, –0.85; P=0.002). Intervention with acupressure using standard treatment as control showed significant reduction in pain intensity (MD –4.78; 95% CI –5.32, –4.24; P<0.00001). Similarly, pain was significantly lower with manual pressure (two studies; SMD –0.42; 95% CI –0.69, 0.15; P=0.002) when compared to standard treatment. Pain scores were significantly lower in patients who received pinch technique, ShotBlocker, massage, or combination intervention (skin traction, pressure, and rapid muscle release) compared with no intervention, standard treatment, or placebo control. Conclusions: The evidence from this review demonstrates that physical stimulation – particularly the Helfer skin tap technique, acupressure, manual pressure, pinch technique, ShotBlocker, massage, and combination – can significantly lower intramuscular injection pain; however, this is based on low or very low certainty of evidence. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42020168586

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference53 articles.

1. Large-volume IM injections: a review of best practices;Hopkins;Oncol Nurse Advis,2013

2. Using ventrogluteal site in intramuscular injections is a priority or an alternative?;Kara;Int J Caring Sci,2015

3. Can lidocaine be safely used to reduce pain caused by intramuscular penicillin injections? A short literature review;Zeydi;Oman Med J,2012

4. Effect of massage on pain perception after administration of intramuscular injection among adult patients;Kanika;Nurs Midwifery Res J,2011

5. Establishing best practice guidelines for administration of intramuscular injections in the adult: a systematic review of the literature;Wynaden;Contemp Nurse,2005

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3