Ethical issues when conducting health research with military personnel: a scoping review protocol

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to understand the scope and nature of evidence in relation to the ethical issues that arise when conducting health research with military personnel. Introduction: Ethical obligations in human research have been debated for centuries. Historically, research conducted with military personnel has led to ethical controversies regarding autonomy, harm, and informed consent. In particular, the power dynamics, hierarchical nature, and culture that are inherent in military structures may compromise the voluntary nature of research participation. Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will include all sources of evidence that identify ethical issues, such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, within health research with military personnel, including reservists. This review will exclude sources of evidence that include health research conducted during combat or on new technologies for fighting in wars. Methods: This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A 3-step search strategy will be used to obtain both published and unpublished sources of evidence. Two independent reviewers will screen sources of evidence against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. No limits on language will be applied; we will use Google Translate to translate sources of evidence in languages other than English. Sources of evidence published since 1964 will be included Data will be extracted using a purpose-designed spreadsheet and the results will be summarized descriptively and presented in a tabular format. Review registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/db85p