Experiences of mental health practitioners after clients’ suicide: a qualitative systematic review protocol

Author:

Du Jian1ORCID,Li Jiaoli1ORCID,Kantor Jiří1ORCID,Kabiri Neda2ORCID,Svobodová Zuzana1ORCID,Munn Zachary3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center of Evidence-based Education and Arts Therapies: A JBI Affiliated Group, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic

2. Iranian EBM Centre: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

3. Health Evidence Synthesis Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this qualitative systematic review will be to understand the experiences of mental health practitioners after clients’ suicide. Introduction: Mental health practitioners inevitably encounter client suicide during their careers, which can significantly affect their personal lives and professional outcomes. A deeper understanding of mental health practitioners’ experiences in the aftermath of clients’ suicide is necessary to provide effective support and assist with adaptation to this situation. Inclusion criteria: This systematic review will consider qualitative studies that explore the experiences of mental health practitioners, including psychotherapists, psychiatrists, psychological counselors, clinical psychologists, psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners, and social workers following clients’ suicide. Experiences may include emotional responses, coping strategies, changes in social relationships, and reflections on practice. Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for qualitative systematic reviews. The databases to be searched will include PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), SocINDEX (EBSCOhost), Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Bibliographia Medica Čechoslovaca, and Bibliographia Medica Slovaca. Gray literature sources will include Google Scholar, and ProQuest. Studies in English, Czech, Slovak, and Chinese will be assessed for inclusion regardless of publication date. Studies that are initially selected will be assessed for methodological quality using the JBI critical appraisal tool for qualitative studies. Then, findings with illustrations will be extracted for subsequent meta-aggregation and ConQual assessment. All the above steps will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Systematic Review Registration Number: PROSPERO CRD42023410523

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference22 articles.

1. The DSM‐5: classification and criteria changes;Regier;World Psychiatry,2013

2. Contact with mental health and primary care providers before suicide: a review of the evidence;Luoma;Am J Psychiatry,2002

3. Client suicidal behaviour: impact, interventions, and implications for psychologists;Trimble;Aust Psychol,2000

4. Patient suicide: frequency and impact on psychologists;Chemtob;Psychol: Res Pract,1988

5. Therapists’ reactions to patients’ suicides;Hendin;Am J Psychiatry,2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3