Abstract
The publication of genetic epidemiology meta-analyses has increased rapidly, but it has been suggested that many of the statistically significant results are false positive. In addition, most such meta-analyses have been redundant, duplicate, and erroneous, leading to research waste. In addition, since most claimed candidate gene associations were false-positives, correctly interpreting the published results is important. In this review, we emphasize the importance of interpreting the results of genetic epidemiology meta-analyses using Bayesian statistics and gene network analysis, which could be applied in other diseases.
Funder
National Research Foundation of Korea
Ministry of Education
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Subject
Pediatrics,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Deconvoluting the heterogeneity of SLE: The contribution of ancestry;Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology;2022-01
2. Rheumatische Erkrankungen;Depression, Angst, traumatischer Stress und internistische Erkrankungen;2022
3. Hidden mysteries behind genome, epigenome, and exposome of lupus erythematosus;Trends in Molecular Medicine;2021-09