Abstract
This study aims to develop and test the reliability and validity of a multi-item teachers’ perceived presenteeism behavior scale. For this, first of all, a semi-structured interview form was applied to 57 teachers, an item pool was formed for the presenteeism scale with the data obtained, and the draft form of the scale was prepared in line with the expert opinions. Then, the draft scale form was applied to 382 teachers, and exploratory factor analysis was performed with the data obtained. As a result of the analysis, a three-dimensional scale structure consisting of 14 items was obtained. Data were collected from 303 teachers to confirm this structure, and the three-factors scale structure was confirmed based on acceptable fit values with confirmatory factor analysis. It was determined that the validated second-order three-factor model provided convergent and discriminant validity criteria. The measurement invariance of the scale according to gender, marital status, and age groups was tested, and it was observed that the same structure was measured in different groups. Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient and composite reliability values showed that sufficient reliability values were achieved for the scale. Finally, the test-retest performed to test its stability showed that the scale was stable. Thus, it was concluded that the scale is valid and reliable with sufficient conditions to measure the teachers' perceptions of presenteeism.
Publisher
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
Reference81 articles.
1. Abasilim, U.D., Salau, O.P., & Falola, O.H. (2015). Toward an understanding of presenteeism and its effects in the workplace. Journal of Public Administration & Management, 1(1), 74-85. http://eprints.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/7380/
2. Ammendolia, C., Côté, P., Cancelliere, C., Cassidy, D., Hartvigsen, J, Boyle, E., Soklaridis, S., Stern, P., & Amick, B. (2016). Healthy and productive workers: Using intervention mapping to design a workplace health promotion and wellness program to improve presenteeism. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3843-x
3. Aronsson, G., & Gustafsson, K. (2005). Sickness presenteeism: prevalence, attendance-pressure factors, and an outline of a model for research. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 47(1), 958 966. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000177219.75677.17
4. Aronsson, G., Gustafsson, K., & Dallner, M. (2000). Sick but yet at work: An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 54(1), 502-509. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1731716/
5. Baker-McClearn, D., Greasley, K., Dale, J., & Griffith, F. (20l0). Absent management and presenteeism: The pressures on employees to attend work and impact of attendance on performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(3), 311 328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00118.x
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献