Tracking Body Composition Change with Weight Loss by BIA and DXA in Female Adolescent Runners: A Validation Study

Author:

Uchiyama Eriko,Kinoshita Norimitsu1,Okuyama Kenta2

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Sports and Health Studies, Hosei University, Tokyo, JAPAN

2. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, SWEDEN

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction/Purpose Monitoring percent body fat (%fat) is important for optimizing nutrition for balanced health and performance in adolescent female runners. We studied the effectiveness of segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (S-MFBIA) for tracking seasonal changes in body composition among competitive female adolescent runners. Methods We compared the body compositions of 25 female runners (15.0 ± 0.2 yr old) analyzed using S-MFBIA, using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference, in preparatory (PRE) and competitive (CMP) seasons. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to calculate associations between S-MFBIA and DXA. Paired t-test was used to compare PRE with CMP. Alpha level was corrected to 0.0023 using the Bonferroni method. Bland–Altman analysis was used to evaluate agreement between the methods. Results The runners gained a significant amount of fat-free mass (FFM) but lost %fat and weight from PRE to CMP (37.3–39.1 kg, 19.7%–12.7%, and 47.1–44.8 kg, respectively). Body composition variables measured by S-MFBIA and DXA were significantly correlated (r = 0.61–0.96) with respect to PRE, CMP, and longitudinal changes from PRE to CMP. S-MFBIA underestimated %fat (−1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.7 to −0.7 percentage points (pp)) and fat mass (FM; −0.7; 95% CI, −1.2 to −0.3 kg), but overestimated FFM (1.1; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.5 kg) against DXA in PRE. No systematic errors were detected in CMP. In longitudinal evaluation, S-MFBIA underestimated decreases in %fat (1.2; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.1 pp) and FM (0.5; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.9 kg) and increases in FFM (−1.0; 95% CI, −1.4 to −0.6 kg). The limits of agreement were −3.0 to 5.4 pp, −1.4 to 2.4 kg, and −3.0 to 1.0 kg, respectively. Conclusions Although small systematic errors might not hinder the use of S-MFBIA for group-based analysis, large random errors relative to the size of measurement limit its ability to accurately monitor the individual body composition of competitive female adolescent runners over a weight loss period.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3