Effect of Ultramarathon Trail Running at Sea Level and Altitude on Alveolar–Capillary Function and Lung Diffusion
Author:
STEWART GLENN M., FERMOYLE CAITLIN C., WHEATLEY-GUY COURTNEY M.1, ROBACH PAUL2, TILLER NICHOLAS B.3, TAYLOR BRYAN J.4, ZIEGLER BRIANA5, SCHWARTZ JESSE5, GAVET ALICE2, CHABRIDON LOÏC2, MURDOCK ROBERT W.6, CONSTANTINI KEREN7, JOHNSON BRUCE D.5
Affiliation:
1. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 2. Ecole Nationale des Sports de Montagne, Chamonix, FRANCE 3. Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrence, CA 4. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 5. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 6. Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 7. School of public health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, and Sylvan Adams Sports Institute, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, ISRAEL
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Introduction
Endurance exercise at altitude can increase cardiac output and pulmonary vascular pressure to levels that may exceed the stress tolerability of the alveolar–capillary unit. This study examined the effect of ultramarathon trail racing at different altitudes (ranging from <1000 m to between 1500 and 2700 m) on alveolar–capillary recruitment and lung diffusion.
Methods
Cardiac and lung function were examined before and after an ultramarathon in 67 runners (age: 41 ± 9 yr, body mass index: 23 ± 2 kg·m−2, 10 females), and following 12–24 h of recovery in a subset (n = 27). Cardiac biomarkers (cTnI and BNP) were assessed from whole blood, whereas lung fluid accumulation (comet tails), stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (Q) were quantified via echocardiography. Lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) and its components, alveolar membrane conductance (Dm) and capillary blood volume (Vc), were determined via a single-breath method at rest and during three stages of submaximal semirecumbent cycling (20, 30, and 40 W).
Results
Average race time was 25 ± 12 h. From pre- to post-race, there was an increase in cardiac biomarkers (cTnI: 0.04 ± 0.02 vs 0.13 ± 0.03 ng·mL−1, BNP: 20 ± 2 vs 112 ± 21 pg·mL−1; P < 0.01) and lung comet tails (2 ± 1 vs 7 ± 6, P < 0.01), a decrease in resting and exercise SV (76 ± 2 vs 69 ± 2 mL, 40 W: 93 ± 2 vs 88 ± 2 mL; P < 0.01), and an elevation in Q at rest (4.1 ± 0.1 vs 4.6 ± 0.2 L·min−1, P < 0.01; 40 W: 7.3 ± 0.2 vs 7.4 ± 0.3 L·min−1, P = 0.899). Resting DLco and Vc decreased after the race (P < 0.01), whereas Dm was unchanged (P = 0.465); however, during the three stages of exercise, DLco, Vc, and Dm were all reduced from pre- to post-race (40 W: 36.3 ± 0.9 vs 33.0 ± 0.8 mL·min−1·mm Hg−1, 83 ± 3 vs 73 ± 2 mL, 186 ± 6 vs 170 ± 7 mL·min−1·mm Hg−1, respectively; P < 0.01). When corrected for alveolar volume and Q, DLco decreased from pre- to post-race (P < 0.01), and changes in DLco were similar for all ultramarathon events (P > 0.05).
Conclusions
Competing in an ultramarathon leads to a transient increase in cardiac injury biomarkers, mild lung-fluid accumulation, and impairments in lung diffusion. Reductions in DLco are predominantly caused by a reduced Vc and possible pulmonary capillary de-recruitment at rest. However, impairments in alveolar–capillary recruitment and Dm both contribute to a fall in exertional DLco following an ultramarathon. Perturbations in lung diffusion were evident across a range of event distances and varying environmental exposures.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference58 articles.
1. Participation trends of ultra endurance events;Sports Med Arthrosc,2019 2. Exercise is medicine? The cardiorespiratory implications of ultra-marathon;Curr Sport Med Rep,2020 3. Cardiovascular consequences of completing a 160-km ultramarathon;Med Sci Sports Exerc,2009 4. Changes in lung function during an extreme mountain ultramarathon;Scand J Med Sci Sports,2015 5. Pulmonary circulation at exercise;Compr Physiol,2012
|
|