Contemporary Catechetics (Christian Instruction) is Not Inclusive Enough

Author:

Kallon Titus Mohamed1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Religious and Interfaith Studies, Ernest Bai Koroma University of Science and Technology, Makeni Sierra Leone.

Abstract

The Catholic Church has a tradition that is rich in nurturing the faith of the lay faithful and even those faithful who have decided to answer the call of religious life. This article seeks to re-examine the way catechism has been taught and challenges the Church and other faithful to open up the conversation because the present model does not adequately address the essential dimensions of the catechetical enterprise. Contemporary Catechism is not inclusive enough. Also, to be a Church in the actual sense and to reach out holistically in the twenty-first century, a dedication to fostering mature, committed adult communities of faith is core to the life of the Church. Therefore, the church needs to educate in faith for the life span of the Church. To educate in faith goes beyond recitation of dogma or creed. Through library and empirical research, this study found out that Catechesis should go beyond rote learning. It should transcend the question of “Who made you?” In summary, the interest, and experiences of the faithful should be inculcated in the instruction process to enable a holistic mastering of faith. Catechism should enable participants to comprehend and embrace Christian teachings with convictions and to allow such convictions to shape their identity and holiness of life. In all, this study recommends a teaching that goes beyond the memorization of dogmas and creeds, a teaching that captures the interests and aspirations of the laity to enable them to maturely grow in faith. This then is a model for further research. Keywords: Contemporary Catechesis, Religious Education, Inclusive Catechesis.

Publisher

Noyam Publishers

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference16 articles.

1. Boys, Mary C. Educating in Faith. Lima, Ohio: Academic Renewal Press, 2001.

2. Dewey, John. “Progressive Education and the Science of Education.” Recherche & formation 92 no 3 (2019): 71.

3. Ellery, William C. “Unitarian Christianity A Discourse on Some of the Distinguishing Opinions of Unitarians” Delivered at Baltimore, Boston American Unitarian Association, accessed January 26, 2021,http://www.worldcat.org>oclc

4. Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. UK, London Continuum International Publishing Group Inc, 1993.

5. Groome, Thomas H. “Religious Education and Catechesis.” No Divorce for the Children’s Sake, 53, no. 11 (2002): 587, accessed January 20, 2021, https://www.jstor.org/stable/27664627

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3