Author:
Taboada-Iglesias Yaiza,Gutiérrez-Sánchez Águeda,Alonso- Fernández Diego,Vernetta-Santana Mercedes
Abstract
Somatotype is one of the variables seen as the key to success in sports and talent detection at different ages. This is confirmed by evidence in some gymnastic disciplines in different age categories, but no study has been conducted for Acrobatic Gymnastics. The objective is to establish the characteristic somatotype profile in Acrobatic Gymnastics for each age group, determining whether there are differences among them and between the roles in each one. The sample was made up of 54 female tops (X= 11.23 years; 29.62 Kg) and 75 female bases (X= 14.46 years; 50.48 Kg). The somatotype was calculated using the Heath-Carter method to determine the mesomorphy, endomorphy, and ectomorphy of each group. The statistical analysis carried out consisted of a descriptive and comparative analysis based on the component in particular and the mean somatotype dispersion in general. The results showed that mesomorphy was the most important component in all categories and roles. They indicated different somatotype classifications in each group, but the importance of ectomorphy in tops and endomorphy in bases should also be pointed out. Significant differences were obtained in mesomorphy (tops: p = .012; bases p = .026) and ectomorphy in both roles (tops p = .036; bases p = .001). Despite finding significant differences among certain categories, this did not follow a linear, chronological development. Therefore, one cannot conclude that the somatotype evolved with age, since this may be due to sports specialization. However, it was confirmed that mesomorphy, as in other gymnastics disciplines, is the predominant component in all categories and roles.
Subject
Education,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Reference27 articles.
1. Bacciotti, S., Baxter-Jones, A., Gaya, A., & Maia, J. (2017). The Physique of Elite Female Artistic Gymnasts: A Systematic Review. Journal of Human Kinetics, 58, 247-259. doi:10.1515/hukin-2017-0075
2. Bacciotti, S., Baxter-Jones, A., Gaya, A., & Maia, J. (2018). Body physique and proportionality of Brazilian female artistic gymnasts. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(7), 749-756. doi: 0.1080/02640414.2017.1340655
3. Batista, A., Garganta, R., & Ávila-Carvalho, L. (2019). Morphological Characteristics and Biological Maturation of Brazilian and Portuguese Gymnasts. International Journal Morphology, 37(2), 561-567. doi:10.4067/S0717-95022019000200561
4. Bies, E. R., & De la Rosa, F. J. B. (2006). Estudio Morfológico en Gimnastas Argentinos de Alto Rendimiento. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano, 8(4), 16-24.
5. Canda, A., Rabadán, M., Sainz, L., & Agorreta, L. (2019). Evolución del perfil antropométrico y fisiológico de las gimnastas de rítmica españolas de ejercicios de conjuntos en los Juegos Olímpicos de 1996 y 2016. Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte, 12(3), 258-262. doi:10.33155/j.ramd.2017.04.001