Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of different methods of surgical hemostasis in patients with placenta accreta spectrum disorders

Author:

Tskhay V. B.1ORCID,Bakunina A. A.1

Affiliation:

1. Prof. V.F. Voyno-Yasenetskiy Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Abstract

Currently, the medical community has accumulated significant experience in the use of endovascular methods in obstetric practice to achieve hemostasis and prevent massive hemorrhage, including in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders. Objective — to evaluate the effectiveness of various methods of uterine devascularization in reducing blood loss during caesarean section in patients with PAS. In this review, we analyzed relevant literature and assessed the quality of clinical trials based on a systematic search in the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. The review presents an overview of modern methods of uterine devascularization aimed at reducing intraoperative blood loss in patients with PAS. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of such methods of uterine devascularization as temporary balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries, common iliac arteries, abdominal aorta, as well as arterial compression using distal hemostasis was carried out. We evaluated effectiveness of the methods by such indicators as the mean amount of blood loss and the frequency of hysterectomy. The most effective methods of hemostasis in patients with PAS are temporary balloon occlusion of the abdominal aorta and the method of distal hemostasis. At the same time, there is still no ideal method for uterine devascularization in PAS, and clinical research in this direction should be continued.

Publisher

Rostov State Medical University

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3