A new technique of intraoperative prevention of infectious complications during penile prosthesis implantation
-
Published:2020-12-23
Issue:4
Volume:8
Page:129-134
-
ISSN:2308-6424
-
Container-title:Urology Herald
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Vestn. urol.
Author:
Popov S. V.1ORCID, Lledo-Garcia E.2ORCID, Orlov I. N.3ORCID, Topuzov T. M.3ORCID, Kyzlasov P. S.4ORCID, Gribanov D. V.3ORCID, Pestryakov I. Yu.3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. St. Luke Clinical Hospital; S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy 2. Hospital General of Gregorio Maranon University 3. St. Luke Clinical Hospital 4. Russian Federation State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center
Abstract
Penile prosthetics is the «gold standard» for treatment of severe or drug-induced refractory erectile dysfunction. One of the most formidable postoperative complications of penile prosthetics is periprosthetic infection. Currently, infusion and topical application of broad-spectrum antibacterial drugs is used for the prevention of prosthetic infectious complications. One of the means for the prevention of postoperative infectious complications is the Alexis retractor (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA). It is a port that is installed in the surgical area and limits the contact of the prosthesis components with the surrounding tissues and skin, achieving optimal wound visualization. The use of Alexis provides atraumatic retraction of the wound edges and 360-degree protection of the wound from the contact of the implant components with adjacent tissues and skin.
Publisher
Rostov State Medical University
Reference12 articles.
1. Baas W, O'Connor B, Welliver C, Stahl PJ, Stember DS, Wilson SK, Kohler TS. Worldwide trends in penile implantation surgery: data from over 63,000 implants. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(1):31-37. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.26 2. Popov S.V., Orlov I.N., Grin' Y.A., Malevich S.M., Gul'ko A.M., Topuzo T.M., Kyzlasov P.S., Povelitsa E.A. Erectile dysfunction: new technologies and approaches in diagnostics and treatment. Urology Herald. 2020;8(2):78-92. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2020-8-2-78-92 3. Gross MS, Phillips EA, Carrasquillo RJ, Thornton A, Greenfield JM, Levine LA, Alukal JP, Conners WP 3rd, Glina S, Tanrikut C, Honig SC, Becher EF, Bennett NE, Wang R, Perito PE, Stahl PJ, Rossello Gaya M, Rossello Barbara M, Cedeno JD, Gheiler EL, Kalejaiye O, Ralph DJ, Kohler TS, Stember DS, Carrion RE, Maria PP, Brant WO, Bickell MW, Garber BB, Pineda M, Burnett AL 2nd, Eid JF, Henry GD, Munarriz RM. Multicenter Investigation of the Micro-Organisms Involved in Penile Prosthesis Infection: An Analysis of the Efficacy of the AUA and EAU Guidelines for Penile Prosthesis Prophylaxis. J Sex Med. 2017;14(3):455-463. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.01.007 4. Udalov Yu.D., Kyzlasov P.S., Martov A.G., Zabelin M.V., Kazhera A.A. The preoperative and postoperative period when phalloendoprosthesis. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2018;1(61):222-224. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 32855548 5. Kyzlasov P.S., Martov A.G., Pomeshkin E. V., Troyakov V.M., Kapsargin F.P. Treatment of peyronie''s disease. Medicine in Kuzbass. 2017;16(1);3-10. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 28779424
|
|