KIDNEY OPEN RESECTION IN RENAL CELL CARCINOMA

Author:

Shkodkin S. V.ORCID,Idashkin Yu. B.ORCID,Fironov S. A.,Fentisov V. V.ORCID,Udovenko A. N.ORCID

Abstract

Introduction.Generally recognized critical moments in kidney resection are the time of ischemia and the adequacy of hemostasis. Until now, one of the main contraindications to nephron-sparing treatment is the inability to provide hemostasis in middle-segment tumors, especially when they are intrarenal.Purpose of research.To evaluate the effectiveness of open resection of the kidney.Materials and methods.For the period 2005 to 2018 us made 152 open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for renal cell carcinoma. The algorithm OPN included extra peritoneal lumbotome access in the IX intercostal space with resection of the X rib resection under conditions of warm ischemia for compression of the blood vessel, in 92.8% of cases completed the clamping of segmental or aberrant arteries. Resection was performed, retreating from the tumor 0.5-1 cm within the unchanged renal parenchyma.Results.The mean age of patients was 55.4±16.2 years; male/female ratio was 52.6/47.4%; right-sided/ left-sided tumor localization was 42.1/57.9%, respectively. The duration of the operation was 109.6±56.7 min, the time of partial ischemia was 15.1±8.3 min, the volume of blood loss was 258±93 ml the Discharge along the drains lasted for 4-12 hours after the operation and averaged 35.7±22.1 ml. Patients were activated after 24 hours, when the urethral catheter was removed, in 59 (38.8%) cases, bladder drainage was not performed. Average postoperative hospital stay was 10.1±4.2 per day.Conclusion.The technique of open resection of the kidney with a margin from the border of the visible tumor and visual control of the surgical edge provides good oncological results, does not require the «Express» histology and is an alternative to nephrectomy in patients with high risk of complications, calculated on morphometric scales.Disclosure: The study did not have sponsorship. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher

Rostov State Medical University

Reference15 articles.

1. Zhang M, Zhao Z, Duan X, Deng T, Cai C, Wu W, Zeng G. ParTIal versus radical nephrectomy for T1b-2N0M0 renal tumors: A propensity score matching study based on the SEER database. PLoS One. 2018;28;13(2):e0193530. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0193530

2. Marchioni M, Preisser F, Bandini M, Nazzani S, Tian Z, Kapoor A, Cindolo L, Abdollah F, Tilki D, BriganTIA, Montorsi F, Shariat SF, Schips L, Karakiewicz PI. Comparison of ParTIal Versus Radical Nephrectomy Eff ect on Othercause Mortality, Cancer-specifi c Mortality, and 30-day Mortality in PaTIents Older Than 75 Years. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;2.pii:S2405-4569(18)30008-7. DOI:10.1016/j. euf.2018.01.007

3. Mosoyan MS, Al’-SHukri SH, Esayan AM, Kayukov IG. Early clinical and funcTIonal indices in paTIents with kid ney cancer who underwent kidney resecTIon or radical nephrectomy. Nefrologiya. 2012;16:4:100-104.

4. Puchkov KV, Filimonov VB, Krapivin AA, Vasin RV, Vasin IV. Surgical treatment of kidney cancer today: laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and resecTIon. Urologiya. 2008;1:47-53.

5. Pavlov AYu, Kravcov IB. FuncTIonal state of the kidneys and the course of the postoperaTIve period when the kidney is resected for cancer. Spravochnik vracha obshchej prakTIki. 2013;7:64-69.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3