Affiliation:
1. Rostov State Medical University
Abstract
Introduction. Currently, the most common method of treating extended urethral strictures is augmentation urethroplasty using oral mucosa grafts. Analysis of the long-term outcomes of this surgery type shows a high incidence of relapses and complications.Purpose of the study. To improve the outcomes of augmentation urethroplasty, in particular the dorsal inlay (Asopa) technique, in patients with extended spongy urethral strictures by minimizing the risk of recurrent strictures.Materials and methods. The study is based on an analysis of the surgery in 90 patients (aged 18-72 years) with extended spongy urethral strictures. Seventy patients (group I) underwent dorsal inlay augmentation urethroplasty according to the Asopa technique, and 20 patients (group II) — according to the author's modified technique. Statistical data analysis was carried out using the SPSS ver.26 software (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA).Results. A comparative analysis of the course of the early postoperative period showed a lower number of complications in group II patients compared to group I — 20.0% versus 34.3%, respectively. The recurrent strictures were registered for groups I and II in 18.8% and 5.6% of cases 6 months after surgery, respectively. The recurrent urethral narrowing was most often localized in the area of distal anastomosis between the buccal graft and the native urethra in patients from both groups.Conclusion. The modified dorsal inlay augmentation urethroplasty technique developed and implemented in clinical practice by increasing the internal urethral lumen in the areas of proximal and distal anastomosis between the buccal graft and the native spongy urethral body allows minimizing the risks of recurrent urethral narrowing after augmentation urethroplasty.
Publisher
Rostov State Medical University
Reference16 articles.
1. Barbagli G, Selli C, Tosto A, Palminteri E. Dorsal free graft urethroplasty. J Urol. 1996;155 (1):123-6. PMID: 7490808.
2. Loran O. B., Veliev E. I., Kotov S. V., Belomytsev S. V. Buccal mucosa graft for augmented urethroplasty. Lechebnoe delo. 2012;(2):93-8. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 17937721.
3. Fuehner C, Dahlem R, Fisch M, Vetterlein MW. Update on managing anterior urethral strictures. Indian J Urol. 2019;35(2):94-100. DOI: 10.4103/iju.IJU_52_19.
4. Prakash G, Singh BP, Sinha RJ, Jhanwar A, Sankhwar S. Is circumferential urethral mobilisation an overdo? A prospective outcome analysis of dorsal onlay and dorso — lateral onlay BMGU for anterior urethral strictures. Int Braz J Urol. 2018;44(2):323-329. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538. IBJU.2016.0599.
5. Sinelnikov L. M., Protoschak V. V., Shestaev A. Y., Karpushchenko E. G., Yartsev A.A. Urethral stricture: modern state of the problem. Literature review. Experimental & clinical urology. 2016;(2):80-87. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 29899545.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献