Assessment of adherence to therapy and options for polypharmacy in patients with CHF according to local registry data

Author:

Tarlovskaya E. I.1ORCID,Omarova Y. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Privolzhsky Research Medical University» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Abstract

Objective: to study the frequency of adherence to therapy, as well as options for existing polypharmacy in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) according to local registry data.Materials and methods: the study included 398 patients with CHF aged 72.17±11.12 years. Patients were divided into groups depending on the type of polypharmacy (appropriate and inappropriate) according to the criteria of the EURO-FORTA (EF) system (2021) and based on national clinical guidelines (CR) (2020), without polypharmacy (taking 1–4 drugs during prehospital stage) who did not take therapy at the prehospital stage - during the last 3 months before the actual hospitalization.Results: depending on the type of polypharmacy at the outpatient stage, the analysis was carried out by comparing 4 groups: appropriate (n=103 (EF) and n=120 (CR)) and inappropriate (n=103 (EF) and n=86 (CR) polypharmacy, without polypharmacy (taking 1-4 drugs) (n=91 (EF) and n=117 (KR)) and not taking therapy at the prehospital stage (n=55 (EF) and n=75 (KR)) during the last 3 months before current hospitalization. According to the Morisky-Green questionnaire, 38.44% were adherent to treatment at the prehospital stage, possibly adherent — 7.28%, non-adherent — 54.28%. The lowest quality of pharmacotherapy at the prehospital stage was observed in the group of patients without polypharmacy: they were less likely than patients with appropriate and inappropriate polypharmacy (according to the CR criteria) to take angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) (30.77% versus 55.00% versus 51.16 %, рmg=0.0001), β-adrenergic blockers (β-AB) (52.13% vs. 88.33% vs. 77.90%, рmg=0.0001) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MCRA) (11.11 % versus 57.50% versus 52.32%, рmg=0.0001) and quite often in 30.77% (p=0.00001) they took potentially unacceptable medications, which further reduced the quality of therapy.Conclusion: according to the Morisky-Green questionnaire, 54.28% of patients with CHF were non-adherent to therapy at the prehospital stage. Patients with CHF at the prehospital stage in 25.2% did not receive treatment for CHF, in 39.3% there was no polypharmacy and in 69.1% polypharmacy was observed. In multimorbid patients with CHF, polypharmacy had the following advantages: more frequent use of 3-component basic therapy for CHF, more frequent use of ACE inhibitors, β-blockers, AMCR, statins for coronary heart disease (CHD), oral anticoagulants (OAC) for fibrillation/flutter atria (AF/AFL) and antihyperglycemic therapy for diabetes mellitus (DM).

Publisher

Rostov State Medical University

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3