Cognitive dissonance in philological perspective

Author:

Drozdova T. V.ORCID,Vishnyakova O. D.ORCID,Vishnyakova E. A.ORCID

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of cognitive dissonance that represents itself as the discrepancy between cognitive bases of communicants, exteriorized at the level of language. Cognitive dissonance may be caused by various reasons, including linguistic ones connected with the inappropriate choice of language means and communicative strategies, as well as social and other extralinguistic factors, which refer to semantic and conceptual incompatibility actualized in human intercourse. As the result, in most cases the communicants tend to eliminate situations of dissonance by various means appropriate and achieve the state of consonance. Within the domain of literary space the potential of language that refers to cognitive dissonance emergence and its further annihilation if possible may be used to produce a certain stylistic effect and produce the aesthetic impact necessary as well as become intellectual stimulus for further inference. The analysis of cognitive dissonance situations represented in the artistic discourse has shown that in the domain of verbal art their creative abilities, both in terms of naturally occurred and intentionally provoked precedents, represented via means of language, can be exploited for the sake of constructing the specific atmosphere of virtual space and artistic images creation, which contributes to the authors message successful transfer to the reader or listener. This may be confirmed by the results of linguopoetic and linguostylistic investigations, as well as profound philological context analysis, based on integrating linguistic knowledge with knowledge of the world, in which language data are prioritized.

Publisher

Samara National Research University

Reference27 articles.

1. Akhmanova, Zadornova 1977 – Akhmanova O., Zadornova V. (1977) On linguopoetics stratification of literary text. Poetica. An International Journal of Linguistic-Literary Studies, no. 7, pp. 50–60. Available at: https://istina.msu.ru/publications/article/6878761/.

2. Andrews 2014 – Andrews Mary (5 August 2014). A book for the beach: The Collector by John Fowles. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2014/aug/05/johnfowles.

3. Aronson 1969 – Aronson E. (1969) The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance: A Current Perspective. In: Berkowitz L. (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press, vol. 4, pp. 1–34.

4. Borisova 2008 – Borisova E.B. (2008) Linguopoetics of verbal art: history, methodology and methods of analysis. Problems of History, Philology and Culture, no 22, pp. 470–476. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lingvopoeticheskiy-analiz-xudozhestvennogo-teksta-istoriya-metodologiya-i-metodika-issledovaniya; https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16803085 = Борисова Е.Б. Лингвопоэтический анализ художественного текста: история, методология и методика исследования // Проблемы истории, филологии, культуры. 2008. № 22. С. 470–476. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lingvopoeticheskiy-analiz-xudozhestvennogo-teksta-istoriya-metodologiya-i-metodika-issledovaniya; https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16803085 =. (In Russ.)

5. Drozdova 2011 – Drozdova T.V. (2011) The discordance in the code-procedural programs of interlocutors as the basis of cognitive dissonance. Bulletin of Tula State University. Film Humanities, no. 1, pp. 531–541. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rassoglassovannost-kodovo-protsedurnyh-programm-kommunikantov-kak-osnova-kognitivnogo-dissonansa; https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17642889 = Дроздова Т.В. Рассогласованность кодово-процедурных программ коммуникантов как основа когнитивного диссонанса // Известия Тульского государственного университета. Гуманитарные науки. 2011. № 1. С. 531–541. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rassoglasso-vannost-kodovo-protsedurnyh-programm-kommunikantov-kak-osnova-kognitivnogo-dissonansa; https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17642889. (In Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3