Category of politeness in Indo-European languages: comparative aspect (based on English, German, Russian, and Urdu)

Author:

Bhatti N. V.ORCID,Gorbacheva O. A.ORCID,Kharitonova E. Yu.ORCID

Abstract

The article discusses the functioning of the category of politeness in Russian, English, German, and Urdu. The relevance of the research topic is stipulated by the need to explore similarities and differences of Western and Eastern linguacultures in terms of forms of politeness and speech etiquette in the context of globalization and intercultural communication. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that it represents an original attempt to compare the means of expressing the category of politeness with regard to European and Urdu content. The article studies grammatical, lexical, and orthographical means of expressing politeness which demonstrate a certain social hierarchy revealed in speech acts. Descriptive, structural, and comparative methods are used in the research. The objective of the study is to establish the major similarities and differences in the usage of the means of expressing politeness in the languages under analysis. The study examines the concepts of speech etiquette, сommunication postulates and social factors determining the choice of a particular verbal means of expressing politeness in a certain communication context as well as the means of expressing politeness as such. The results of the study show that lexical means of expressing politeness tend to be universal for all of the chosen languages and they are represented by lexical units added to the sentence specifically with the aim of making it sound more polite. Conversely, grammatical means of expressing politeness are peculiar to every language and are expressed mainly by the usage of a certain verb form or a modal verb. Orthographical means of expressing politeness are found to be characteristic of the analysed European languages only.

Publisher

Samara National Research University

Reference21 articles.

1. A Critique of Politeness Theories

2. Im/politeness and discursive pragmatics

3. Brown, Levinson 1987 – Brown P., Levinson S. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 345 p. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/26395652/Politeness_Some_universals_in_language_usage.

4. Culpeper 2011 – Culpeper J. (2011) Politeness and Impoliteness. In: Karin Aijmer and Gisle Andersen (eds.) Sociopragmatics, Vol. 5 of Handbooks of Pragmatics edited by Wolfram Bublitz, Andreas H. Jucker and Klaus P. Schneider. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 391–436. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16284767.pdf.

5. Grice 1980 – Grice P.H. (1980) Logik und Gesprächsanalyse. In: Kussmaul P. (Hg.): Sprechakttheorie. Ein Reader. Wiesbaden, S. 109–126.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3