Abstract
The article explores neurotechnologies, gives their definition, provides their classification and objective grounds for implementation. The author of the article, thinking prospectively, assesses the legal and ethical risks in the work of an investigator, interrogator with neuroimplants. The author of the article believes that the use of neotechnologies is a promising direction for solving the problems of investigators, interrogators, whose workload is excessive. This reduces the quality of crime investigation.
Publisher
Samara National Research University
Reference17 articles.
1. Artificial Intelligence and Neurotechnologies: In Need for Constitutional and Legal Regulation
2. Zazulin A. I. Pravovye i metodologicheskie osnovy ispol'zovaniya tsifrovoi informatsii v dokazyvanii po ugolovnomu delu: dis. ... k.yu.n.: 12.00.09 [Legal and methodological bases for the use of digital information in proving in a criminal case: Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis: 12.00.09]. Yekaterinburg, 2018, 251 p. Available at: https://zakon.ru/Publication/Details/15820 [in Russian].
3. Neurotechnologies: Development, practical application and regulation
4. Law and Digital Transformation
5. THEORETICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE EVOLUTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALIZATION AND THE INTRODUCTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY