Applying machine learning methods to identify argumentative connections in scientific communication texts

Author:

Salomatina Natalia V.ORCID,Sidorova Elena A.ORCID,Pimenov Ivan S.ORCID

Abstract

The paper presents the results of experiments to assess the machine learning methods applicability for solving the problem of identifying argumentative connections in scientific communication texts. Argumentative connection is understood as a relationship that connects the premise and the conclusion of a typical reasoning or an argument used by the author to persuade the readers. To assess the quality, the characteristics of accuracy, completeness and F-measure were used obtained when solving the problem of recognizing argumentative connections between adjacent text fragments of two types: sentences and clauses. The basis of the experiment was a Russian-language corpus of texts from the field of scientific communication with arguments marked up by linguistic experts. For markup, the ArgNetBank Studio tool was used, which allows creating collections of texts with detailed argumentation markup. Data sets for machine learning were built on the basis of labeled texts, in which the ratio of pairs of text fragments (sentences or clauses) connected and non-connected by argumentative relationships was 1 to 3. To improve the quality of model training, the sets were balanced in two ways. In the first case, a balance was achieved due to the fact that an equal number of pairs of both types were selected from each text; in the second, pairs were duplicated. Using the obtained data sets, experiments were carried out on linking text fragments using different types of machine learning methods. The range of changes in quality assessments when recognizing related fragments depending on their share in the training and test collections was experimentally determined. It has been established that, within the framework of the existing imbalance in real collections, the values of quality assessments can vary within 40–50%. The novelty of the work lies in the study of the range of possible discrepancies in quality assessments when applying different machine learning methods on balanced and unbalanced training and test collections in Russian-language material.

Publisher

Samara National Research University

Reference17 articles.

1. Lawrence J, Reed C. Argument mining: A survey. Int. J. of Computational Linguistics 2019; 45(4): 765-818.

2. Chen T. BERT Argues: How Attention Informs Argument Mining. Honors Theses; 2021; 1589.

3. Feng V-W, Hirst G. Classifying arguments by scheme. In: Human Language Technologies, proc. of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: 2011; 1: 987-996.

4. Indicator Patterns as Features for Argument Mining

5. Stab C, Gurevych I. Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essay. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP): Proc. of the Int. Conf. (Doha, Qatar); 2014: 46–56.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3