Osteopathy as a field of scientific knowledge: the path to evidence-based research

Author:

Mokhov D. E.1ORCID,Tregubova E. S.1ORCID,Potekhina Yu. P.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Mechnikov North-West Medical State University; Saint-Petersburg State University

2. Privolzhsky Research Medical University; Institute of Osteopathy

Abstract

Osteopathy in Russia has now formed as an independent direction of scientific knowledge and has all three characteristic levels – general philosophical, general scientific and specific scientific, as well as its own methodology. The following had been done in osteopathy as in a scientific direction of medicine: 1) its own conceptual apparatus was created; 2) a methodology had been developed that allows the use of evidence-based medicine approaches and mathematical processing of the results obtained; 3) scientific knowledge has a systematic, ordered nature; 4) the object, subject and content of osteopathy as a scientific direction were determined; 5) experimental and clinical evidence of the effectiveness of osteopathic treatment for various diseases and health disorders had been obtained. When conducting clinical studies in osteopathy, a wide range of methods for examining patients is used to obtain reliable information about the condition of organs and tissues, as well as about the body as a whole. Still it is necessary to develop the scientific component of osteopathy more actively, conduct multicenter clinical research to study clinical effectiveness, develop methodological and organizational foundations for providing osteopathic care to various groups of the population with somatic dysfunctions at all stages (prevention, diagnosis, treatment and medical rehabilitation) in order of preservation of human health, prevention of common non-communicable diseases, medical rehabilitation of patients after serious illnesses.

Publisher

The Institute of the Osteopathy and Holistic Medicine

Reference94 articles.

1. Potekhina Yu. P., Tregubova E. S., Mokhov D. E. Osteopathy is a new medical specialty. Assessment of clinical effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative therapy in various diseases (review). Med. News North Caucasus. 2018; 13 (3): 560–565. https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2018.13105

2. Still A. T. The principles of osteopathy. J. Osteopath. 1905; 12: 351–356.

3. Still A. T. The Philosophy and Mechanical Principles of Osteopathy. Kansas City, Mo.: Hudson-Kimberly Pub. CO.; 1902; 321 p.

4. Littlejohn J. M. Principle of osteopathy. J. Amer. Osteopath. Ass. 1908; 7: 237–246.

5. Sutherland W. G. The cranial bowl. Mankato, MN, 1939 (Reprinted by the Osteopathic Cranial Association, Meridian, IDJ 1948).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3