Fragmentation of employment relationships, fragmentation of working time: the nature of work and employment of platform takeaway riders and implications for decent work in China

Author:

Feng Xiliang1,Cooke Fang Lee2ORCID,Zhao Chenhui3

Affiliation:

1. Capital University of Business and Economics China

2. Monash University Australia

3. Zhongnan University of Economics and Law China

Abstract

This paper critically examines the notion of working time flexibility of platform takeaway riders and its impact on them in China. Drawing on 25 interviews with platform and takeaway delivery company managers and takeaway riders as well as secondary data, the study finds that the management model adopted by the platform companies and their agency companies often encourages riders to extend their working hours by being designed into the rider's earning system, status level and various incentive schemes. Driven by profits, takeaway delivery platform companies pursue speed and impose harsh punishments for poor customer reviews. Severe competition and the platforms' aggressive pricing and commissioning practices mean that takeaway riders' remuneration is tightly squeezed, with no subsidies or overtime payment, and with rules for bonuses that make it increasingly difficult to earn. Working excessively long and intense hours is the only way that riders can increase their income, which suggests that rider‐oriented working time flexibility is virtually non‐existent. We propose the notion of fragmented employment relationships and fragmented working time to conceptualise working time flexibility in the takeaway delivery context in China. We accentuate the need to examine the quality of working time flexibility when examining this practice. We call for state interventions to provide a greater level of social protection than the takeaway riders are currently experiencing to advance the decent work agenda as part of the Sustainable Development Goals.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Reference67 articles.

1. Working-time regimes and transitions in comparative perspective

2. Beijing First Intermediate People's Court Research Group(2021)Rules for defining the legal nature of platform employment relations under the new employment situation.People's Court News.https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2021/09/id/6280854.shtml

3. Beijing Zhicheng Legal Aid and Research Center for Migrant Workers(2021).Shedding light on the employment patterns of food delivery platforms from data from 1 907 court rulings. Legal Academic Frontier (1907份判决数据透视外卖平台用工模式。 法学学术前沿).https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/UW-NEYN0jTonp6SzeYmFZg

4. Contesting Time: International Comparisons of Employee Control of Working Time

5. BoltzM BCockx AMDiazandLSalas(2020)How does working‐time flexibility affect workers' productivity in a routine job? Evidence from a field experiment No. 13825. IZA Discussion Papers.http://hdl.handle.net/10419/227352

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3