Contraceptive decision‐making through the lens of social determinants of health among female sex workers: A qualitative descriptive study

Author:

Zemlak Jessica L.12ORCID,Alexander Kamila A.13,Wilson Deborah1,Sherman Susan G.4

Affiliation:

1. Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing 525 N. Wolfe Street Baltimore Maryland 21205 USA

2. Marquette University College of Nursing 530 N. 16th Street Milwaukee Wisconsin 53233 USA

3. Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland United States

4. Department of Health, Behavior and Society Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 615 N Wolfe Street Baltimore Maryland 21205 USA

Abstract

AbstractAimsThe aim of the study was to examine how female sex worker's motivations, desires, intentions and behaviours towards childbearing and childbearing avoidance inform their contraceptive decision‐making. We explored the influence of social determinants of health in the domains of social context (sexual partners and experiences of violence), healthcare access, economic instability on the contraceptive decision‐making process.DesignWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study informed by Miller's Theory of Childbearing Motivations, Desires and Intentions through the lens of social determinants of health.MethodsParticipants were recruited from a parent study, EMERALD, in July–September, 2020. Data were collected from 22 female sex workers ages 18–49 using semi‐structured 45 to 60‐min audio‐recorded interviews and transcribed verbatim. Theory guided the development of the study's interview guide and thematic analytic strategy.ResultsFive themes emerged related to contraceptive decision‐making: Motivations (value of fatherhood), Desires (relationships with love), Intentions and Behaviours (drugs overpower everything, contraceptive strategies and having children means being a protector). Women's contraceptive decision‐making often included intentions to use contraception. However, social determinants such relationships with clients and intimate partners, interpersonal violence and challenges accessing traditional health care offering contraceptive services often interfered with these intentions and influenced contraceptive behaviours.ConclusionWomen's contraceptive decision‐making process included well‐informed desires related to childbearing and contraceptive use. However, social determinants across domains of health interfered with autonomous contraceptive decision‐making. More effort is needed to examine the influence of social determinants on the reproductive health of this population.ImpactFindings from this study build on existing research that examines social determinants impacting reproductive health among female sex workers. Existing theoretical frameworks may not fully capture the influence constrained reproductive autonomy has on contraceptive decision‐making. Future studies examining interpersonal and structural barriers to contraception are warranted.Patient or Public ContributionThe parent study, EMERALD, collaborated with community service providers in the study intervention.

Funder

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

Reference29 articles.

1. Optimizing Care for Women of reproductive age with one key question;Baldwin S. R.;Rx for Prevention,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3