Driving predictors in a cohort of cognitively impaired Mexican American and non‐Hispanic White individuals

Author:

Malvitz Madelyn1ORCID,Zahuranec Darin B.1,Chang Wen2,Heeringa Steven G.2,Briceño Emily M.13ORCID,Mehdipanah Roshanak4,Gonzales Xavier F.5,Levine Deborah A.16,Langa Kenneth M.267ORCID,Garcia Nelda1,Morgenstern Lewis B.18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA

2. University of Michigan Institute of Social Research Ann Arbor Michigan USA

3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA

4. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education University of Michigan School of Public Health Ann Arbor Michigan USA

5. Department of Life Sciences Texas A&M Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Texas USA

6. Department of Internal Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA

7. Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research Ann Arbor Michigan USA

8. University of Michigan School of Public Health Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health Ann Arbor Michigan USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIndividuals with Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease‐related dementias may lose the ability to drive safely as their disease progresses. Little is known about driving prevalence in older Latinx and non‐Hispanic White (NHW) individuals. We investigated the prevalence of driving status among individuals with cognitive impairment in a population‐based cohort.MethodsThis was a cross‐sectional analysis of the cohort BASIC‐Cognitive study in a community of Mexican American (MA) and NHW individuals in South Texas. Participants scored ≤25 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), indicating a likelihood of cognitive impairment. Current driving status was assessed by the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol informant interview. Logistic regression was used to assess driving versus non‐driving adjusted for pre‐specified covariates. Chi‐square and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare NHW and MA differences in driving outcomes from the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) questions for evaluating driving risk in dementia.ResultsThere were 635 participants, 77.0 mean age, 62.4% women, and 17.3 mean MoCA. Of these, 360 (61.4%) were current drivers with 250 of 411 (60.8%) MA participants driving, and 121 of 190 (63.70%) NHW participants driving (p = 0.50). In fully adjusted models age, sex, cognitive impairment, language preference, and Activities of Daily Living scores were significant predictors for the likelihood of driving (p < 0.0001). Severity of cognitive impairment was inversely associated with odds of driving, but this relationship was not found in those preferring Spanish language for interviews. Around one‐third of all caregivers had concerns about their care‐recipient driving. There were no significant differences in MA and NHW driving habits and outcomes from the AAN questionnaire.ConclusionsThe majority of participants with cognitive impairment were currently driving. This is a cause for concern for many caregivers. There were no significant ethnic driving differences. Associations with current driving in cognitively impaired persons require further research.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3