Time series generative adversarial network for muscle force prognostication using statistical outlier detection

Abstract

AbstractMachine learning approaches, such as artificial neural networks (ANN), effectively perform various tasks and provide new predictive models for complicated physiological systems. Examples of Robotics applications involving direct human engagement, such as controlling prosthetic arms, athletic training, and investigating muscle physiology. It is now time for automated systems to take over modelling and monitoring tasks. However, there is a problem with the massive amount of time series data collected to build accurate forecasting systems. There may be inconsistencies in forecasting muscle forces due to the enormous amount of data. As a result, anomaly detection techniques play a significant role in detecting anomalous data. Detecting anomalies can help reduce redundancy and free up large storage space for storing relevant time‐series data. This paper employs several anomaly detection techniques, including Isolation Forest (iforest), K‐Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Open Support Vector Machine (OSVM), Histogram, and Local Outlier Factor (LOF). These techniques have been used by Long Short‐Term Memory (LSTM), Auto‐Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), and Prophet models. The dataset used in this study contained raw measurements of body movements (kinematics) and the forces generated during walking (kinetics) of 57 healthy people (29 Female, 28 Male) without walking abnormalities or recent leg injuries. To increase the data samples, we used TimeGAN that generates synthetic time series data with temporal dependencies, aiding in training robust predictive models for muscle force prediction. The results are then compared with different evaluation metrics for five different samples. It is found that anomaly detection techniques with LSTM, ARIMA, and Prophet models provided better performance in forecasting muscle forces. The iforest method achieved the best Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (r) of 0.95, which is a competitive score with existing systems that perform between 0.7 and 0.9. The methodology provides a foundation for precision medicine, enhancing prognostic capability over relying solely on population averages.