Author:
Thomas Bryan,Gostin Lawrence O.
Abstract
To someone holding a hammer, the cliché goes, everything looks like a nail. A similar myopia often afflicts legal minds as they approach deep-seated problems in global health, as every crisis is approached by first asking how it might be litigated away. In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the limits of litigation as a tool for advancing equitable access to health — indeed of its potential, under some circumstances, to have a positively regressive impact. This very timely symposium offers us a chance to reflect more deeply on the matter.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference51 articles.
1. “Asleep at the Switch: Local Public Health and Chronic Disease,”;Frieden;American Journal of Public Health,2004
2. 46. World Health Organization, Global Health Risks: Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risks (Geneva: WHO, 2009).
3. “What (Not) to Do About Obesity: A Moderate Aristotelian Answer,”;Epstein;Georgetown Law Journal,2005
4. Global health, equity and the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
5. “Small Taxes on Soft Drinks and Snack Foods to Promote Health,”;Jacobson;American Journal of Public Health,2000
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献