How patients' psycho‐social profiles contribute to decision‐making in epilepsy surgery: A prospective study

Author:

Hohmann Louisa12ORCID,Bien Christian G.3ORCID,Holtkamp Martin2ORCID,Grewe Philip34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Berlin–Brandenburg Epilepsy Center Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Free University and Humboldt University of Berlin Berlin Germany

2. Epilepsy‐Center Berlin‐Brandenburg, Institute for Diagnostics of Epilepsy Queen Elisabeth Herzberge Protestant Hospital Berlin Germany

3. Department of Epileptology, Mara Hospital (Bethel Epilepsy Center), Medical School Bielefeld University Bielefeld Germany

4. Clinical Neuropsychology and Epilepsy Research, Medical School Bielefeld University Bielefeld Germany

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveIdentifying factors associated with surgical decision‐making is important to understand reasons for underutilization of epilepsy surgery. Neurologists' recommendations for surgery and patients' acceptance of these recommendations depend on clinical epilepsy variables, for example, lateralization and localization of seizure onset zones. Moreover, previous research shows associations with demographic factors, for example, age and sex. Here, we investigate the relevance of patients' psycho‐social profile for surgical decision‐making.MethodsWe prospectively studied 296 patients from two large German epilepsy centers. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to investigate variables linked to neurologists' recommendations for and patients' acceptance of surgery or intracranial video‐electroencephalographic monitoring. Patients' psycho‐social profiles were assessed via self‐reports and controlled for various clinical–demographic variables. Model selection was performed using the Akaike information criterion.ResultsAs expected, models for neurologists' surgery recommendations primarily revealed clinical factors such as lateralization and localization of the seizure onset zone, load with antiseizure medication (ASM), and site of the epilepsy‐center. For this outcome, employment was the only relevant psycho‐social aspect (odds ratio [OR] = .38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .13–1.11). In contrast, three of the five relevant predictors for patients' acceptance were psycho‐social. Higher odds were found for those with more subjective ASM adverse events (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = .99–1.00), more subjective seizure severity (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01–1.24), and lower subjective cognitive impairment (OR = .98, 95% CI = .96–1.00).SignificanceWe demonstrated the relevance of the patients' psycho‐social profile for decision‐making in epilepsy surgery, particularly for patients' decisions. Thus, in addition to clinical–demographic variables, patients' individual psycho‐social characteristics add to the understanding of surgical decision‐making. From a clinical perspective, this calls for individually tailored counseling to assist patients in finding the optimal treatment option.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3