Surprising pandemic experiences: A confrontation between principle‐based and virtue ethics, and a plea for virtue ethics training for medical students and residents. A rudimentary outline of a four‐step model

Author:

Zuckerman Shlomit1ORCID,Kimsma Gerrit K.2,Devisch Ignaas3

Affiliation:

1. Bioethics and Law Center, Department of Disaster Management, Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel

2. Department of Philosophy and Medical Ethics (Formerly) Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Philosophy of Medicine & Ethics, Department of Public Health and Primary Care Ghent University Ghent Belgium

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn past years, physicians have, with a certain continuity, reported increasing numbers of burnout, depression and compassion fatigue in their daily practice. These problems were attributed, not only but also, to a loss of public trust and an increase in violent behaviour of patients and family members towards medical professionals in all walks of life. Recently, however, during the breakout of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic in 2020, there were public expressions of appreciation and respect for health care workers that almost universally have been assessed as indications of a re‐establishment of public trust in physicians and appreciation for the medical professions' commitments. In other words, shared experiences of what society was in need of: the experience of a ‘common good’. Those responses during the COVID‐19 pandemic increased positive feelings among practicing physicians, such as commitment, solidarity, competency, and experiences concerning obligations for the common good and a sense of belonging to one and the same community for all. Essentially, these responses of raised self‐awareness of commitment and solidarity between (potential) patients and medical personal point towards the social importance and power of these values and virtues. This shared domain in ethical sources of behaviour seems to hold a promise of overcoming gaps between the different spheres of doctors and patients. That promise justifies stressing the relevance of this shared domain of Virtue Ethics in the training of physicians.MethodsIn this article, therefore, we shall make a plea for the relevance of Virtue Ethics before proposing an outline of an educational programme for Virtue Ethics training for medical students and residents. Let us start by very briefly presenting on Aristotelian virtues and its relevance to modern medicine in general, and during the current pandemic in particular.ResultsWe shall follow up this short presentation by a Virtue Ethics Training Model and the respective settings in which it takes place. This model has four steps as follows: (a) include moral character literacy in the formal curriculum; (b) provide ethics role modelling and informal training in moral character in the healthcare setting by senior staff; (c) create and apply regulatory guidelines regarding virtues and rules; and (d) assess success of training by evaluation of moral character of physicians.ConclusionApplying the four‐step model may contribute to strengthening the development of moral character in medical students and residents, and decrease the negative consequences of moral distress, burnout and compassion fatigue in health care personnel. In the future, this model should be empirically studied.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference45 articles.

1. Sinnott‐ArmstrongW.Consequentialism.2003. Accessed January 27 2021.https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/entries/consequentialism/

2. AlexanderL MooreM.Deontological ethics.2007. Accessed January 27 2021.https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/win2012/entries/ethics-deontological/

3. The Dying Patient Act.Clause 45 (Hebrew).2005.https://www.health.gov.il/LegislationLibrary/Zchuyot_03.pdf

4. Thieves of Virtue

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3