In vitro quality parameters of whole blood‐derived platelets pooled using two different platelet pooling sets and stored up to 7 days are similar

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIncreasing the number of collections of whole blood‐derived platelets (WBDP) and lengthening the allowable storage time may alleviate platelet (PLT) shortages. There is a need for new PLT pooling sets that can provide acceptable quality on Day 7 of storage.Study Design and MethodsThis pool‐and‐split study compared WBDP prepared using the platelet‐rich plasma method with the novel IMUGARD WB PLT pooling set and a control pooling set. After pooling and filtration, PLT products were tested on Days 1, 5, and 7. Large volume delayed sampling (LVDS) cultures were taken on Day 2.ResultsThe median postfiltration residual white blood cell (rWBC) content was 0.18 million per product (maximum 1.26 million; n = 69) with mean PLT recovery of 88.5 ± 2.8% for the new set and median 0.23 million (maximum 1.83 million) rWBC with 87.5 ± 2.5% recovery for the control. Day 5 mean pH22°C were 7.18 ± 0.12 and 7.13 ± 0.10 for the new and control set, respectively. Day 5 in vitro quality parameters were within 20% between the two pooling sets. The new set Day 7 pH22°C was acceptable (7.07 ± 0.17, 100% ≥ 6.3), and most parameters were within 20% of Day 5 values.ConclusionWBDP quality for the new pooling set is acceptable across a battery of in vitro tests when stored up to 7 days and meets FDA regulatory criteria. The quality parameters were similar between the new pooling set and the control set on Day 5. This new set is compatible with LVDS.