Improving patient engagement in research is not enough to answer the question of what is important for an individual patient in the clinical encounter: A commentary on Turcotte et al. (2023) call for a change in the approach to ‘patient‐oriented’ research-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Improving patient engagement in research is not enough to answer the question of what is important for an individual patient in the clinical encounter: A commentary on Turcotte et al. (2023) call for a change in the approach to ‘patient‐oriented’ research

Published:2023-03-05 Issue:5 Volume:29 Page:741-743
ISSN:1356-1294
Container-title:Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:Evaluation Clinical Practice

Author:

Mercuri Mathew¹²³^ORCID,Gafni Amiram⁴

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton Canada

2. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto Canada

3. Department of Philosophy University of Johannesburg Auckland Park South Africa

4. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact McMaster University Hamilton Canada

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jep.13838

Reference5 articles.

1. TurcotteP‐L HolmesD MurraySJ. The shiny new object: deconstructing the patient‐oriented paradigm in health sciences. J Eval Clin Pract (in press).

2. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities

3. Reflecting on Evidence Based Medicine, Person Centered Medicine and Small Area Variations: how contemporary frameworks for medicine address (or not) the needs of the individual patient

4. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength

5. A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach